or a confidential human sort as the big shots call it in the trump campaign has nothing to do with donald trump? that s ridiculous. but instead of me take on trey gowdy in an opening statement which i fully intended to do, i instead decided to get some insight into what may be his thinking from some of his closest colleagues. joining me now congressman jim jordan, chairman mark meadows and congressman ron desantis, all members of the freedom caucus and you be relenting voices in the fight for truth in this russia probe. now, i m going to start with you, mark meadows. under no circumstances would anyone think of placing a spy or as they want to call it, a confidential human source, someone who clearly has foreign
angry, but i am even more confused. confused as to why congressman trey gowdy chairman of the house collect committee on intelligence. one of the few people in washington who has the intelligence, the expertise and the ability to see through the nonsense if not illegality going on at the fbi and the department of justice. fray gowdy would say this about a spy placed in the trump campaign. i am even more convinced the fbi did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got, and it has nothing to do with donald trump. judge jeanine: why was i stunned and upset with that answer? number one, trey gowdy knows he s not supposed to confirm nor deny spygate. saying that the placing of a spy or a confidential human sort as
its game between the two trials, so had the defense. that s when well known attorney steve harman and gretch entered the scene and they came out swinging. that story about christy s affair, for example. there s a shadow hanging overall of this stuff, very human sort of shadow, which is that she was having a little affair, right? had a boyfriend. yes. if the husband knew about it, but the wife never, ever mentions it and tells the husband, no one tells the husband. quite right, said the judge. and because there was no evidence that chris knew about his wife s affair, he ruled it out of the trial. the story about hall shooting himself for retirement benefits that was just absolutely a lie. that s wrong. there was never, never any evidence or indication or not even a moment s breath that he shot himself. anyway, the story was
viewpoint. now the prosecution was ready. in may 2011, one year after the first jury deadlocked, burke strunsky went back to court armed with his new evidence for a brand new panel of hall s peers. jurors heard medical experts testify about the injuries to christi s head and once again heard lindsay s 911 call. i saw him put her under water. cristi s co-workers testified for the prosecution. and jerry winkle traveled from idaho to tell jurors what he thought of chris hall. i was ashamed to admit that he was once a police officer. but, if the prosecution had upped its game in the year between the two trials, so had the defense. that s when well-known attorney steve harmon and paul grech entered the scene, and they came out swinging. that story about cristi s affair, for example? there s a shadow hanging over all of this stuff. very human sort of shadow, which is that she was having a little affair. right? had a boyfriend. yes. if the husband knew about it.
jurors heard medical experts testify about the jir injuries the head. and lindsey s 911 call. the co-workers testified for the prosecution. and jerry winkle traveled from idaho to tell jurors what he thought of chris hall. i was ashamed to admit that he was once a police officer. but if the prosecution upped the game in the year before the two trials, so had the defense and well-known attorney steve harmon and paul gretch entered the scene and came out swinging. the story of the affair, for example? there s a shadow hanging over all of this stuff. very human sort of shadow which is that she was having a little affair. right? had a boyfriend. yes. if the husband knew about it but the wife never, ever mentions it and tells the husband.