University working with the Campaign Finance board to complete that. But it seemed to given the sort of similar circumstances between the two cities seemed to be well reasoned. Is that the same argument for why the threshold for the dollar amount in the contract was raised from 50 to 100 . We were able to break that down in our analysis based on the reports we had seen and it appeared to us that the 50,000 threshold was capturing potentially wasnt capturing a lot of the money, i dont have the specific numbers in front of me, but raising it to the 100,000 threshold reduces the number of affected parties by 100, 120 i think it was. But captured 80 of the money. So we thought it was a substantial amount of the money still captured but not having less sophisticated or the parties that shouldnt be captured. That was based on your own analysis. Correct. And page 12 line 22, why is the term of the period of prohibitions expanded from six to 12 months, is there data that supports that change .
25 of all contributions. We have not been able to do the same analysis that was done by a university working with the Campaign Finance board to complete that. But it seemed to given the sort of similar circumstances between the two cities seemed to be well reasoned. Is that the same argument for why the threshold for the dollar amount in the contract was raised from 50 to 100 . We were able to break that down in our analysis based on the reports we had seen and it appeared to us that the 50,000 threshold was capturing potentially wasnt capturing a lot of the money, i dont have the specific numbers in front of me, but raising it to the 100,000 threshold reduces the number of affected parties by 100, 120 i think it was. But captured 80 of the money. So we thought it was a substantial amount of the money still captured but not having less sophisticated or the parties that shouldnt be captured. That was based on your own analysis. Correct. And page 12 line 22, why is the term of the period
You indicate d you wanted to make a motion that the board retains authority to approve or disapprove the promect . Yes and by striking it for that particular line item, it allows for this board och supervisors approve the contract for the dephrine and propose facility regardless of the amount so by striking that line that is what im doing. Thank you madam president deputy City Attorney john gibner. The board has the authority to approve contracts in excess of 10 Million Dollars, contracts under 10 Million Dollars dont require board approval so in this contract we would advice the Contracting Department whether they have to come to board and that would typically still be the 10 Million Dollar 10 year thesh hold and the are Construction Contracts that require board approval la regardless of the dollar thresh hold. 345dm clerk for item 65 can you as amendmented please comthe roll . Supervisor breed, aye. Christensen, aye. Cohen, aye. Farrell, aye. Kim, no. Mar, no. Tang, aye. Wiener, aye.
System. Jofe adauchy came out with a [inaudible] and pretrial diversion and bail reform is a issue. Something that was highlighted by cliff boughter who committed suicide after being kept in jail for years stealing a back back when he was 16 or 17. We know in San Francisco black adults are more likely than white adults to meet the criteria than pretrial release. Yet, they are far less likely to be released at arraignment than other white adults with a prior felony. So many opportunities, there are so many different steps we need to look at to how to reduce the population and folks that are there because they committed a crime, but the issue is outside crimial intentx Mental Health and substance abuse. Before we come to a determination of what the board will approve t is our obligation to look at every alternative before us. The last point ill make about applying for state funding, i wont support funding for the state grant can i remind the public vocal spegz isnt allowed. Feel free use
To order and thank everyone for their forbearance. We have concluded with member Opening Statements. The chair reminds members that all member Opening Statements will be made part of the record. We do want to thank our witnesses for being here today , taking time to testify before the subcommittee on this important issue. Each witness will have the opportunity to give an Opening Statement followed by questions from members. Again, as previously mentioned , we will hear from mr. Michael holmes, jamie schneider, associate commissioner for s Chip Services, health and Human Services from the state of texas and ms. Cindy man. We appreciate you being here today. Mr. Holmes you are recognized for five minutes for an Opening Statement. Thank you chairman. Ranking member greene, members of the subcommittee, my name is mike holmes. I am the ceo of Cook Area Health Services. We provide medical, dental, and Behavioral Healthcare in nine locations more than 12000 patients of rule northern minnesota