. he has tweeted and retweeted he has confirmed several attacks on ukraine, reporting multiple attacks being investigating. attacks on breach medical neutrality, and violates the human role. you see his re-tweeted, saying that w.h.o. has process six attacks on the ukraine. that is doctor . saying that there is breach of humanitarian law taking place. also, a briefing of general staff this morning, have said that more than 11,000 russian troops have been killed since moscow launched the invasion of ukraine on february 24th. so that is reuters, they are quoting the ukrainians. clearly it comes from the
decided on their own. do you think environment, guns have the ability to spread like a fire through the public in a way that we ll see our politicians catching up with? well, on the gun issue, i m a little more skeptical because we have had incident after incident, tragedy after tragedy and yet nothing seems to change. and here today i m skeptical still we ll see real action to address some of these issues. with respect to the environment, that s one of the issues that has been slow moving for a while, but as it s moved, increasingly the consensus has set in with respect to the human role in climate change. now, the question then becomes how to policy-makers respond to that. i don t see either immigration or the environment moving in the same way as gay marriage did, in part because i m not sure that people have personalized it enough yet. there s the potential for gun
appropriate action. my position would be let s put pressure where pressure needs to be. get the evidence out, and then we make firm decisions paced on that. but i caution to engage with saudi arabia at this time with such a grievous action is something i would not be very supportive of. i do want to get your take on something else. you have said as recently as last week, there is no doubt that climate is changing. you believe there is a human role here, that humans have definitely played a part, as we know, the president said on sunday he does not believe to be the case. you also called out china and india saying we need to see more action from them on this front. does there need to be more action from the united states, especially in light of some of the changes we have seen under president trump and the pulling back on the part of the u.s.? i think we re already leading. as americans, as the united states, so i recognize that climate change is something we need to deal with. we n
and president trump they have their chief of staffs sit in, to mind the conversation. al gore said that was pressurci time with the president, i could talk to him about issues i cared about. it seems odd their relationship seems to need to be managed this way. there are stories in this book about melania s role in the pence selection. stories about people like paul agnew. walter mon dame and a human role he played in the history of the modern vice presidency. all part of kate brouwer s new book first in line. thanks for being here. thank you. coming up, the wide ranging comments of our president on the
he there was a times column under the headline, climate of complete certainty. stevens used the example of hillary clinton s failed campaign to show that such certainty can lead to hubris. while not denying climate change nor human role in it, he nevertheless set that while climate science is scrupulous, that s not always the case with its boosters. the column sparked a hue and cry, and some subscription cancellations. which i find ridiculous. or consider the democratic taunts of gop members who voted to repeal obamacare on thursday. na, na, hey, hey, good-bye my cnn colleague chris lizza was right to say that this kind of jeering and mocking is exactly why people hate politics. look, the left is understandably fired up, but there s only one beneficiary in a climate of liberal intolerance, and that s donald trump. he s helped when he is no longer the bad behaving outlier but the norm in a political atmosphere run amok.