moment whether this is geopolitics or cyber security or a mix of both. what they are obviously concerned about our china and the commies party and data with bytedance which is a chinese owned company. how far is a chinese owned company. how far is the concern spread is it limited just to governments or will corporate start to look at this in say hang on we have sensitive data on our servers. shill say hang on we have sensitive data on our servers- on our servers. all social media platforms on our servers. all social media platforms make on our servers. all social media platforms make their on our servers. all social media platforms make their money i on our servers. all social media platforms make their money byj platforms make their money by harvesting loads of data. and finding out all of us. and when the context is the ownership of that company is a chinese and there could be leakage or sharing of that data with the chinese communist party. and they are grave human rights ris
up human rights risks and makes you sit up and think are there real risks? there are some cybersecurity reports that have been saying that tiktok as an app does collect an awful lot more data than comparative other apps. you know, popular social media apps. you know, popular social media apps. there is not a huge amount of data. we wait for the national cybersecurity centre s report that dowden mentioned, but i think we have now normalise the collection of data at this vast scale. that when you get the context of tiktok it does make you sit up and wonder what are the human rights risks, what are the cybersecurity risks. stand are the human rights risks, what are the cybersecurity risks. the cybersecurity risks. and what about the first the cybersecurity risks. and what about the first amendment. i the cybersecurity risks. and what i about the first amendment. freedom of speech? this is what people want to defend in america. would it make a difference if bytedance was sold to an amer
it seems like they are willing to white wash the offenses in china. they are willing to turn a blind eye to slave labor, to internment camps, disappearing citizens and the same time many companies study up in the united states against a state election law in the state of georgia, they were compelled to stand up and say that that election law in georgia shouldn t be in place, and even pull out of georgia, pull out of atlanta and yet silent on china. sandra: they see a lot of dollars in china, people buying things and big business and profits for a lot of the companies. i wonder if you can tell us how you believe the companies will respond to this letter that you are announcing right now, considering this. this is human rights watch. they wrote to the companies asking them how they are managing the human rights risks of their involvement with the
Download the Report Blockchain technology has been proposed as a potential answer to a variety of human rights challenges, from ease of access to voting and identity-based service delivery to land rights protections and supply chain traceability. As this report reveals, however, blockchain alone is almost never sufficient to address the complex set of factors that lead to