gave me real? chat gpt says, yes, they are. plenty of human lawyer error here, chat gpt might still be a valid tool for lawyers, you have to verify at least at this stage, because it is really in its infancy. and the problem is, when you sign something or file something to the court, you are verifying that everything in there is accurate, and it is not verified if you only ask chat gpt if it is verified. chat gpt cannot take responsibility, the lawyer has to take responsibility. and i don t appreciate being texted to ask if i was the lawyer that did this. these are questions of the audience needs to have answered. so this combination of human error and the use of ai, sort of going awry. what is the outcome of this case now? they toss it? not necessarily toss it, although that was the issue of the ocean where it was filed.