we have a presidential campaign on the horizon. and again, all american voters get the bulk of their information about everything including candidates on the internet and google, of course, is the portal to the internet. so, do you think that the biases you are describing will influence the outcome of the election? how could they not? i think it is going to. if people aren t able to think critically about the information they re given, especially if there is this illusion that maybe somehow technology exists in a world apart from humans or you can create a computer to think for itself and be free of human biases, people could be easily mislead or manipulated. tucker: so you are basically saying that google is a liberal company and its liberalism will tilt the presidential election? are you going to be punished
decisions that are going to affect my health and whether or not this chemical is going to be in my drinking water. it takes every dime i have to save up money to drive to jerry s house and ride with jerry to d.c. these people can fly in on jets. they re wearing armani suits. they have headquarters in d.c. how can the public compete with that? my intent for appearing here today is to ensure that science is allowed to do its work without human biases affecting the results. i can t say that for many of the other special interest groups whose motivations are driven by the all-mighty dollar and the others who are attempting to shirk their liabilities. well, we fully admit that this is a carcinogen to rats and other animals. yet we still just haven t tweaked that thing to where we could say it s a carcinogen to humans. the benefit of the doubt looks like it s going to go to the
not this chemical is going to be in my drinking water. it takes every dime i have to save up money to drive to jerry s house and ride with jerry to d.c. these people can fly in on jets. they re wearing armani suits. they have headquarters in d.c. how can the public compete with that? my intent for appearing here today is to ensure that science is allowed to do its work without human biases affecting the results. i can t say that for any of the other special interest groups whose motivations are driven by the all-mighty dollar and the others who are attempting to shirk their liabilities. well, we fully admit that this is a carcinogen to rats and other animals. yet we still just haven t tweaked that thing to where we could say it s a carcinogen to humans. the benefit of the doubt looks like it s going to go to the chemical. and not to protect public
save up money to go drive to jerry s house and ride with jerry to d.c. these people come flying in on jets. they re wearing amari suits. they have headquarters in d.c. how can the public compete with that? my intent for appearing here today is to ensure that science is allowed to do its work without human biases affecting the results. i can t say that from any of the other special interest groups whose motivations are driven by the almighty dollar and others who are attempting to shirk their liabilities while we fully admit that this is a carcinogen to rats and other animals, but yet we still just haven t tweaked that thing to where we could say it s a carcinogen to humans. the benefit of the doubt looks like it s going to go to the chemical and not to protect public health. what is wrong with this picture?
it takes every dime i have to save up money to drive to jerry s house and ride with jerry to d.c. these people can fly in on jets. they re wearing amari suits. they have headquarters in d.c. how can the public compete with that? my intent for appearing here today is to ensure that science is allowed to do its work without human biases affecting the results. i can t say that for any of the other special interest groups whose motivations are driven by the all-mighty dollar and the others who are attempting to shirk their liabilities. well, we fully admit that this is a carcinogen to rats and other animals. yet we still just haven t tweaked that thing to where we could say it s a carcinogen to humans. the benefit of the doubt looks like it s going to go to the chemical. and not to protect public