freedom and i hope it will be reversed by the court. there, john, the speaker is smart enough not to support corporations but to defend catholic charities. the danger of this argument is some organizations will stop offering health care if they can. i don t know if that s legal now. is it? is that one alternative? if you can t discriminate in what coverage you offer, you just don t offer any. you d be faced with huged to. what the court is taking up right now is, in fact, not so much to do with what the previous controversy and the catholic question. this is really a question about corporates about how corporations are defined. is a corporation a person? that is the question. that s the question. and in fact, the appeals court that ruled in favor of the company in this case that said it didn t, that it shouldn t have to provide health coverage plans that included contraception said that its reasoning was based on citizens