universities. part of the scheme involving cheating on standardized exams like the sat and falsely designating some kids as athletes to get preferential treatment even if they weren t athletes at all and had nothing to do with those sports. in huffman emphasis case she paid $15,000 to have a college counselor correct answers on her daughter s sat test resulting in a higher score. tom, in this case what did she pay the test moderator to do to get her kid s numbers up. what did she actually do for the money? it was two thinks. one she d be able to have her daughter take the test with no time limit whatsoever. as we know from taking the college boards you have a certain amount of time to complete certain portions of of the test. she would be able to take as much time as she wanted. in addition to that what she pleaded guilty to and what we saw in the charging documents was that the person who