see a buffoon elevated to martyr status. now that cnn is on the side of free speech, i m sure they will be advocating for all people appear to they could have sued in 2013 on behalf of fox. tucker: victor davis hanson, a man with a long memory. we appreciate it. thank you. there used to be dozens of pro-second amendment democrats in congress. there aren t anymore coming out at the party is increasingly calling for disarming the public. do the public want that? that is next.
these migrants are being coached by groups like people without borders, a chicago-based immigration advocacy group, even left-leaning news organizations like the los angeles times and washington post have reported that members of pueblos sin fronteras, are embedded with the group. mexico is offered most of these people asylum and jobs, and yet, they continue heading north. also, they could move to the u.s. border in texas, but instead, they go the long way, hundreds of miles out of their way, to tijuana, and that is because the goal is to get to california and take advantage of the states sanctuary laws and the benefits that go along with that. of course, thousands begin arriving the next few weeks, synthetic groups will be at the border to greet them. talker. tucker: trace gallagher, thanks for the update. appreciate it. the images you just saw are embarrassing and awkward for the
didn t vote in the senate race were double voted. and there is a very specific law for what voter intent is. if you circle rick scott or bill nelson, that is fine, but you have to have done it throughout the ballot. the machine won t read it. they want to throughout that standard and just let it be i don t know what. tucker: can you change the standard after the voters? that s my concern. you say there s a problem with the lawsuit, the legislator is there. but have a judge coming and i and also florida law after the election, we re going to change the rules, in hopes of influencing the outcome, that, to me, is stealing the election. they also want to force them to count every mail ballot, even the one on which the signature didn t match the signature on file for the voter. these are the two fundamental arguments. tucker: that is the requirement, that the signature has to match. that is the existing requirement, how can they argue it is no longer the requirement? they say is a
i swore an oath to the constitution of the united states. i work for the american people. and i believe i can do so while still being strong allies of japan, strong allies of great britain, strong allies of countries all around the world. especially when our interests intersect. tucker: i think this is a vital conversation, and i m glad we re having this. i m glad you articulate it so quick, clearly paired thank you, senator. thank you for having me. tucker: there is a battle over free speech going on in washington right now. good. we are for free speech. the question is, are the people who work claiming they are defending free speech actually defenders of speech? whatever that means. we will investigate the assault on free speech after the break. (burke) at farmers, we ve seen almost everything,
elected officials are saying, we should have background checks so lunatics don t have the access to guns. tucker: the most recent shooting many of these shootings have been paid by people who had back on check spared the latest shooter, obviously, you just on california come with three back on track. the truth is, it is not just back on checks come with nobody really opposes. it is limiting the kind of firearms you can buy, limiting the size of the magazines you can use, limiting the kind of ammunition you can use and purchase. these are laws, restrictions, that affect normal people who should be able to defend themselves. why is that? when you say nobody really opposes when you have republican leaders to affirm the fact tucker: lets be serious. background checks, i buy on, so i know, they are in place. you go through it when you buy a gun. why would a magazine restriction, and ammo restriction, or an assault rifle restriction, apply to me? why am i not trusted to buy any