the senate. you can see from the judiciary committee we ll hear in him up on capitol hill, it s unclear whether that would be a closed hearing or an open meeting. i m not sure as much about whether chuck grassley has pursued a hearing. we re going to move to health care now, this new poll from abc/ washington post, 50% prefer obama care, 24% prefer the gop plan, 17% say neither or something else. do you think it s possible that public sentiment, even many gop
seculo speaking this morning on television. you said this was a lawyer who was russian, this was a lawyer who was russian and what took place at that meeting, the discussions involved russian adoptions. it was quickly ended. it was in the middle of a campaign. so there you get the idea that they re trying to say that it was a meeting to talk about an issue and it just so happened that the individuals were russian and not directly officially openly attached to the russian government. that s the kinds of things that the officials want to look at. also the issue of russian adoptions. the putin administration has been very opposed to that 2012 american laws that put sanctions
general eisenhower didn t attack the beaches of normandy. it s just a silly thing to say. when- i think he did a lot of the work for the investigators, you know, quite kindly by explicitly stating that he was thrilled to have dirt provided by russian intelligence service or the russian government or intermediaries for it, that s fair to say, and was interested in receiving it and using it and that s the fact. was there any fact that the russian lawyer, that she acted on her own, that she initiated the meeting without the blessing of the russian government or any intelligence agencies? well, that is possible. but it s also not especially relevant because often you will have standing guidance, you know, and you don t have to be teleguided, you will now turn right, you will now make this
administration. there are three investigating going on about russia meddling in the election in the united states. i don t think that most americans believe that the russians hacked into individual coins election systems. any country who wants to try to influence the outcome of any american election. i think mr. kushner eeg omission of this russia meeting probably bought him an appearance in front of all three, when if he would have disclosed more information on this front end, this may not be nearly the issue for him and the trump family that its become. i m glad to hear you say that and glad to have you on the program. as details unfold in the meeting involving donald trump jr. and multiple russians, what
suggestion which isn t very smart on his part. that trump was going to be in the meeting. because when you re a candidate, the candidate has secret service protection. the family doesn t. and the campaign manager doesn t. so the only reason for the secret service to vet somebody who was meeting in that tower was if trump him was going to be at the meeting. that raises a whole new question that hasn t been raised before. as far as the ukrainian stuff, that s nonsense. that s the kind of stuff you see open fox news. were there contacts? sure. hillary clinton was secretary of state. i m sure she had lots of contacts. all right, susan, your thoughts? at the end of the day, donald trump s president and hillary clinton s not. we need to keep the focus on the elected president. and to look backwards is just some rope a dope stuff we ve seen coming out of this white house. what i m also very concerned about is when they start talking about who was in that meeting.