gut: ion think a cste? ? govementhut wn wld gue i t ank a ventt we a castroe. howe r, t precadentro nes. to wead. t re ntde neot letoingn this. ise. heide magonisoo is he poi. ma th fisl yrsalfoi th oveis y so letfgree toveisage o so wh we areetoing tee doit theo ag o re of thwhere aromein u t witohe a umbe anrefweh wl bein u toit debaa thebebigan ehich w i wh bo repr enta ve pbal ryhegs ch i sang.h il: t aprta pouplry ofea sa .partrs sd we let : hem tpl ay wh ifecisn o rt scuttwegetm llio how ill w i this g ott trlion ioow l gues theth g me aery go tron int. at i aesheery m gdy pont. but a t. iy gyingd th pimpa.e t ais ng necethary caustheypa are pling polics morecey usaneyre plgolsre yingwhathe aricapeop want and othepoin sse youngat a ca brout itop ntp, nd harhein sreidou and oueit demratsant to nar ameid d the aem tsrtynt t people for e t y re pblicles dng whor the t
years. this is one of those matters where the critics suggest ed it may be just a matter of time before we start seeing more serious problems like what we just saw out in california, anderson. number of incidents isn t moving up, why do they think they ll see more serious problems? a very fair question. many people in the industry say, look, there s no evidence of it. what they re saying is this is just like what we ve seen in the mining and oil industries, anderson. fundamentally, there are just not enough inspectors out there. the federal pipeline and hazardous material safety administration is under-funded. so, most of the inspections are left up to the states, which, in turn, often rely on guess what. we ve heard this refrain before. they rely on the companies themselves to keep track of potential problems. the very thing that gentleman was describing there. they go out and look and say is anything wrong here? the head of this agency, howe r however, says she inherited years