Be detrimental to the guard. There is approximately 75 feet of frontage on 7th street and 75 street of frontage on langdon street. The surrounding area is characterized by a variety of us uses including industrial, residential and commercial use. The project site is within a quarter mile of several municipal transit lines and is within a half a mile of the civic center b. A. R. T. Station. The project received an Environmental Review on september 26, 2017 and received a Community Plan exemption under ceqa. To date, the department has received four letters of support and one inquiry regarding the project. Also, pursuant to planning code section 314, the Entertainment Commission was notified about the project because it was just under 300 feet within a place of entertainment, and although a hearing was not held on the project, the project sponsor is present and will address any issues. The project sponsor has included public yououtreach, wh is considered in your presentation. All new sha
Afternoon hours when the park has maximum sun light exposure. The variation of the shadow cast would vary throughout the year, with new shadow being present for a high of 138 minutes and an average of 78 minutes. New shadow would not be present throughout the year, and no new shadow cast throughout the winter. New shadow would affect about one half of the garden plots in summer and onethird of the plots in spring and fall. This is why the park and Rec Department find that the new shadow cast by the proposed project at 7th street would not have a significant adverse impact on the use of Howard Langdon mini park garden pursuant to 295. Additionally under the large project authorization, some things to consider. The overall math and scale is consistent with the changing context of the i cant irrelevant and Residential Development along 7th street. Lankdon streets historical facade will be preserved for the main buildings entrance. And it will provide a code complying rear yard. Overall, i
To reauthorize the entitlement, but there has to not actual progress on thE Construction of the project. Commissioners, maybe instead of trying to craft specific metrics, the thing to be to say you prefer to have a hearing in two years. Its your discretion to revoke or not. You could consider the progress, whether there was applications made, whether there was due diligences, if there were delays caused by other entities, and you could choose not to revoke or you could choose to extend that deadline, or you could choose to revoke. Scheduling a revocation hearing doesnt mean you automatically have to revoke. Commissioner johnson right. I would just to i would just make clear, rather than trying to craft specific time frames that i think were not it would be very challenging, you could simply say well have a hearing in two years and consider reviewation. Commissioner johnson okay. Revocation. Commissioner johnson okay. I think thats clear to me. Number 2, theres even today, we cant const