you know it has been stunning pretty sit on the judiciary committee have seen every one of these nominees. biden consistently has chosen hard left activist political activist, brazenly, one of the nominees recently described ilhimself as a wild i left wing activist those are his own terms. that nominee described thehe hatred he hasns for conservatives. that again was his own terms. the nominees and joe biden as put forth for the bench are more radical than any judicial nominees in our nations history the far more radical than obama s work for their more radical than clinton s work for their more radical than jimmy carter s work. the nominees biden is putting forward, or nominees he believes will undermine our rights paid will undermine free speech. will undermine religious liberty will undermine the second amendment. as you know, lester wrote a book called one vote away. how a single supreme court seat can change history. c and in that book one vote away
senator said today. that selection process took place out of the public eye and it appears to have been informed heavily by dark money interests. here is laura ingraham on fox news concerned about abortion cases coming up before the court after all the money that has been raised, all these big fat cat dinners and unfortunately the federal society was not alone. write down the hallway is something called the judicial crisis network. judge jeanine: you were in the room when he said this today. your response? sean: senator whitehouse delivered some top shelf gaslighting today. he just went on and on about concerns about conservative dark money and ignored the fact that the nominee being looked at, she is the one being pushed by some extreme dark money groups who
believe and then they get on the bench and they go hard a hard left and i think there s real reasons to have concerns that if judge jackson becomes justice jackson, we ll see of all on the far left, possibly the furthest left of any of the nine justices particularly in criminal justices. it s an odd thing. but for 30 years, she has been advocating lighter sentences, more treatment for sexual offenders who target kids and just in general. i have to say, that doesn t make any sense to me and i think to most americans. sean: what about the issue of court packing? i m a little surprised as to why she refuses to answer that question. a simple question. she says is a policy issue. do you see a constitutional question involved? there is not a constitutional barrier to packing the court.
nominees to the court, i ll name a few names. robert bork, clarence thomas, justice kavanaugh more recently. do you see any of your republican colleagues like lisa murkowski, i assume mitt romney, the usual s supporting her nomination? it certainly possible. the names you suggest would not shock me to see them vote in favor of this confirmation. i hope that they don t do that. but on any close contested political issue, you can see them casting a vote with the democrats. for that matter, what democrats ought to do is to look to her record and ask is this a justice that would defend the constitution? the book i wrote two years ago, how a single supreme court changes history that outlines how religious liberty and the second amendment, they all hang in the balance and we ve got to
Transcripts for FOXNEWS The Ingraham Angle 20211202 03:25:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.