i don t know who you are. this technology can put other people s words in your mouth. but what i do have are a particular set of skills. if you let my daughter go now that will be the end of it. i will not look for you. i will not pursue you. my fellow irishman, as well. lip dub was built for the purpose of allowing studios to take content in their native tongue and put that content across the globe in a way where it looks native to the viewer. for its part, mars says it is not in the business of replacing actors. its technology is meant to enhance performances, not create them. i think it s not a question of the technology. it s how you use it. look, i could be hit by a bus tomorrow, and that s it, but my performances can go on and on and on and on, and outside of the understanding that has been done with a.i. or deep fake, there will be nothing to tell you that it s not me, and me alone. fears of how a.i. will be
or lose their salaries because of it? as a representative from silicon valley, i understand a.i., and the workers, the writers, the actors are absolutely right to say they should be part of how a.i. is used. there are two central concerned. one which you alluded to, which is if you re going to feed information into this a.i. magic box and then it s going to spit out new content, the content that you re feeding in, that should be compensated. and writers are writing scripts, if they re writing plays and a.i. is just tinkering with it, those initial scripts need to be compensated. the second thing is you don t want a.i. replacing writers because what that s going to do is devolve the standard of entertainment. a.i. can t write ted lasso, it can t quite succession. it probably could write bad reality tv. writers are saying, loorx look, we want to have human input.
enhance performances, not create them. i don t think it s a question of the technology. it s how you use it. i could be hit by a bus tomorrow and that is it. my performances can go on and on, and outside of the understanding that it s been done with a eye or deepfake. there will be nothing to tell you that it is not me, in me alone. fears of how a.i. will be used as after the actors union is on strike, saying the studio is going to replace them with artificial performances. the movie studios are pushing back on that claim. technology can t replace an actor full on. you can t go head to toe and redo the entire face, and expect that to be voter real. the technology just isn t there right now. as it relates to rioters, i think that they can more easily be replaced by artificial intelligence. you ended on rioters there, although by the way, you with
conversation because the world is not aligned on whether a.i. is a threat or an amazing thing, but we do understand, like we learned with social media, like we learned with a whole lot of other things, that if it is not regulated, or at least understood by the regulators like yourself, we could face a whole world of hurt. ali, good to see you again and let me be clear. you mentioned the screen actors guild strike and the actors strike, the efforts, the members of the actors guild, the members of the writers guild to obtain their wages. but when these challenges, it s a classic example of how a.i., on one hand, is not new technology. any time you been on your phone, and it is probably going to be in your text and that s an example of a i, predictive a, i that log people are familiar with maybe not knowing it is a i. but a, i as a general
this was a remarkable conversation because the world is not aligned on whether a. i. is a threat or an amazing thing, but we do understand, like we learned with social media, like we learned with a whole lot of other things, that if it is not regulated, or at least understood by the regulators like yourself, we could face a whole world of hurt. ali, good to see you again and let me be clear. you mentioned the screen actors guild strike and the actors strike, the efforts, the members of the actors guild, the members of the writers guild to obtain their fair wages. but when these challenges, it s a classic example of how a. i., on one hand, is not new technology. any time you been on your phone, and it is probably going to be in your text and that s an example