the maximum amount fema can pro vida about $34,000 and average families get about $6,000 to $7,000. we have small business administration disas tr lo. so there are a lot of congress will have to come back with addition an funding for other programs to provide even more needed funds to help communities recover particularly on the housing side with the uninsurance laws. i ve never heard those stats. $34,000 max provided by fema and 6,000 to 7,000 to folks on average. craig, thanks for the information. what are you seeing?
tax states and on the housing side, $25,000 cap covers the vast, vast, vast majority of home owners in meter. so millionaires and billionaires who won t get the mortgage deduction but it s not going to have an appreciatable effect on the housing market. do you think tax plans should be revenue neutral? ran paul says, no, the idea is to shrink government. mine is revenue neutral under a dynamic scoring model because we repeal all the obamacare taxes taxes and obamacare. if you done. dynamic means the revenue that you re going to generate off of the cut. that s correct. according to tax foundation, if we throw in the repeal of obamas could and all of it subsidies this is a $600 billion increase in revenue if you will because of some of the government cuts. i it s a trillion dollars more
part of what is happening in the stock market, it is going up. that is in part a commentary from the market. it is a belief the economy is going to grow. the economy is going to become real. we are not trapped in a slow growth normal. we will not see a real house in recovery. a recovery for who? when you look at the housing side of it. stick here. sometimes it s the only truth that matters in the context of the economy. let s stay here. when we come back, i want to look at the chart you said is going viral. we ll talk about that when we get back. introducing new febreze stick & refresh
terrible to a lot of viewers and a lost folks and me. and you. it really did help do one thing really important, which is bring the credit system back. we can talk about ways that it could have been perhaps more efficiently but that was a pretty inexpensive way to get the credit system back up and running. now on the housing side, i m with you, man. i think there is a lot more to do there. i guess the only thing i would dispute, you made some good points and i want to get into it. the expense of unemployment and hit to revenue is more than is accounted for in the balance sheet. you know what i m saying. you re talking to a guy who thinks precisely along those lines. but let s remember, under any other, if you nationalized everything i know, listen, ways there. gentlemen have to improve it from here. we have to agree to improve it from here. exactly. we could go for years on that one. under any scenario you are