Within 1560 days. Violations can take 3 years. We are well aware of that. Its up to Code Enforcement. They review all the notices of violations that are up in Code Enforcement. They are picking up the notices of violation that they feel should come up to directors hearing. Thats how they prioritize it. They look at them and see which one is the most pertinent to bring up to a hearing. Anyone want to comment on that . When presenting numbers, its a huge challenge to try and take any particular criteria, how do you present it because would it take for instance the directors hearing there. Those numbers reflect four hearings a month, particular exact addresses that appear on each of those 4 days for that month. But, even within those numbers, you take a particular case at the start of the month, it would show up in the first director hearing for that month as scheduled, but if it was continued for 3 weeks and a month, that same case would show up at the end of the month as a continued cas
Director did approve, kind of a swat team to try to move these applications forward quickly, i am told by the building inspector who is leading that effort that the week of september the 14th, they will be doing 16 inspections a week. And they have been doing roughly about ten right now. And so, they are getting a combined team of electrical plumbing, and building together so that they can go through these applications and actually make these inspections and generate the report as quickly as possible. And i mean it is possible, of course, that tomorrow, we will see, a big number come in. That we cannot really anticipate. Interestingly enough, dpws restores has also told us that they were expecting a lot of applications, to date they have had 51. So, again, it is far below, the volume that might be in there. And at any rate, i would say that, we are prepared internally to move this legislation forward as quickly as possible. Thank you. Is there any commissioner comment on this. Any Publ
Resolved, right . Right. Some of the complaints are complaints received and an abated without nov. Thats a complaint that was taken and investigated and abated. Okay. My question is why do those numbers, they are bigger than the numbers of complaints received . Because there is existing complaints in the system. Okay. You are not talking about the july and june months. This is just the month, we are trying to do it on a monthly basis for you. What we are trying to do by a monthly basis is give you a graph eventually so you can see where it goes on a monthly basis. There also maybe a certain amount in the system. The amount per bid for the last 10 years is 3, 375 in 10 years. What we did is there is almost double that that we actively went back into system and reinvestigated all the complaints and weve been very pro active in that for the last 10 years. We are fixing the ones that were backlogged. Correct. The numbers we have here on a basis of the complaints received. So complaints tha
Change very much. This consists of 28. 5 million in additional revenues over the budget and 6. 11 million in savings. And we do plan to transfer 6. 34 in deferred credits for permits that have been submitted but not all of the revenues have been earned. And we talked about this in the past. And in terms of the way that the actual budget occurred. This is the graph that i have up here on the screen, and the budget in the charges for service, and the permits issued in 2013, with 36 percent greater than 11 12 and as we know there has been a lot of large, very large projects that came in, in 12, 13, and there were 9. 37 more permits issued. And this is going to possibly start slowing down. We are starting the specifications for the fee study to ensure that we are charging the correct amount for cost recovery. Any questions . Thank you. Tom, who is taking over for pam when she leaves . My thinking is i will temporarily have gail to temporarily hold up the road for the others. Okay. Next ite
Hearing. Thats how they prioritize it. They look at them and see which one is the most pertinent to bring up to a hearing. Anyone want to comment on that . When presenting numbers, its a huge challenge to try and take any particular criteria, how do you present it because would it take for instance the directors hearing there. Those numbers reflect four hearings a month, particular exact addresses that appear on each of those 4 days for that month. But, even within those numbers, you take a particular case at the start of the month, it would show up in the first director hearing for that month as scheduled, but if it was continued for 3 weeks and a month, that same case would show up at the end of the month as a continued case and it might finish up with an order of abatement. So whenever you look at the numbers, like you kind of have to get your head around that the numbers, you are not looking at the same address each time. In some cases you are looking at a case that came onto the s