If the administration was standing by that tweet which sean spicer said the president is, then why could congress then need to investigate if this information already exists . The Press Secretary talked a little bit about the issu i have to listen to the vshage again, the transcript, but he talked about credibility and the idea there is a separation of powers as well. We also talked a little bit about the idea that hey we are in tax season, tax day is just over month away. Will the president release his returns from this most recent year . The president secretary said he would got back to us. And then is the president still under audit for past returns . The Press Secretary confirming he indeed is. A separation of powers, and they dont want to be perceived as directing congress to investigate in a certain way. Harold ford is this going to dog them much longer . It will. The question by halle and the other young lady spelled i out. I think the health care the governors will be the ar ab
that whatever it is that was wrong, found to be wrong, is corrected in the long term. that has very serious implications. on obamacare repeal, senate majority leader mitch mcconnell invoked a rule that will allow the house s obamacare repeal bill to bypass the usual committee process and make it filibuster-proof to democratic opposition. so as you heard me talk to the congressman about the health care bill that the republicans propose that would cut medicaid, that would not include pre-existing conditions, now we ve seen mcconnell put it through a way that it will skip the process and be filibuster-proof. this is serious stuff that happened this week. yes, we had reason to be watching the comey testimony, and we must watch every step of
better direction, the freedom caucus has prevailed in getting a very critical amendment that will be going on tonight or early in the morning. only time will tell. i remain undeclared so that we maximize our capability to influence the bill in the right direction up to the very end. i have to leave it there but i will tell you, i m just grateful for the freedom caucus and their willingness to go at it as long as they have. some people call it acrimony but it s just creative tension and it makes things happen sometimes and you wish it would be easier but it isn t. tucker: what are the knocks against obamacare and i certainly thought it was legitimate that there was no real public debate about what was in it, famously you had to vote for it before you found out what was in it and that s not a good way to make law that applies to the entire country but that s how the law is being made here, do you see the irony? the truth is this has been far more i was there when obamacare was past
wouldn t be raped, one to be dead themselves are undergoing facial reconstruction surgery or addicted to heroin but for our immigration policy, it s something we can change, let s change it. it tucker: what s interesting is that there seems to be profound misalignment between what the president went on and what the public and leadership stands for. on the speaker of the house website and help me to single them out, we need to encourage legal immigration. that s a real position but it s not really consistent with what the president ran on from what i can tell. no, paul ryan was the vice presidential candidate of a losing presidential ticket, i think republicans ought to be moving to trump s position rather than trump moving to their position. i think what congress ought to be doing now, i would like them to pass on obamacare repeal that says there shall be a free market in health insurance that says those of us who are healthy
the critical flaws of the immigration laws, where joined by danna stein, president fort federation of american immigration reform were joined by alex little a criminal defense attorney and former u.s. attorney it s great to see you both. the obvious question which i just posted the defense lawyer is that this crime could have been prevented, nobody really doubts that. if one of the men and probably both had been deported as he was supposed to be, but the government didn t deport him and now here we stand with the child claiming she was. this is inherently about immigration and its lack of enforcement for political reasons. i fundamentally disagree, the chain of causation that you re laying out is so far attenuated. i had cases as a prosecutor where the defendant would say i did this because i needed to pay for the mother s cancer treatment. is that case about health care reform? but whether were going to reform obamacare? the individual committed a violent crime.