don t agree with al franken on everything but at least he has been a solid member of the senate for those who identify is aas democrat. this is a bigger issue and resignation would signal to the american people the democratic party is principled on this issue that we don t prioritize winning an election or winning a vote or winning an initiative over the lives, the bodies, the stories of women. i think it s important for al franken to resoon and i think it s necessary. a shift not in american politics but culture in life and must do it now. do you think he should resign? i do and i think roy moore should resign. a time you ve taken office to be ethical and in this stance and immediate to apologize is a distraction to the party and more importantly for the progress of america. thank you both. thank you. so up next, saturday night live spoofing attorney general jeff sessions. this time regarding his house
he created what we call rumor intelligence. this is what diplomats and spies would collect working people who are not actually agents for them. you know, you go to dinner parties and things like that. christopher steele s ma am ran dumb, the dossier which i read very early on is a great example of this. however, i think now he s right. i think he is 70% to 90% accurate. things that i read in that dossier that i would never have imagined would be confirmed like, for example, that, you know, prostitutes were offered to donald trump, now we re finding out from house testimony and senate testimony that that is at least 50% true. i would say his estimate of 50% to 90% which is called high confidence is pretty much on par. and if it is, then it s going to be a lot more interesting because there are far more dangerous things in that dossier than the salacious rumors we
malcolm, walk us through this. folks might say if you wrote something shouldn t 100% of it be accurate? 70% to 90% is high. this is raw intel, right? that s right. what christopher steele did was he created what we call rumor intelligence. this is what diplomats and spies would collect working people who are not actually agents for them. you know, you go to dinner parties and things like that. christopher steele s ma am ran dumb, the dossier which i read very early on is a great example of this. however, i think now he s right. i think he is 70% to 90% accurate. things that i read in that dossier that i would never have imagined would be confirmed like, for example, that, you know, prostitutes were offered to donald trump, now we re finding out from house testimony and senate testimony that that
doing that, he s running that agency. i think what he did, which i think was uncoverageabnscionabl do with pressure from the inside and i think he refuted basically the fact that president has said that barack obama tapped him, also comes from internal pressure at the fbi. and i think we i guess we say, i think we discount for that. that s a great point. yet, jeremy, that s a point where i think rick might be right and that would still make jim comey potentially wrong. i heard from multiple law enforcement sources that he was never about swinging the election, but he was about trying to tamp down concerns from within his agency that they weren t hard enough on hillary. he wrote an e-mail that might have been excuse me, wrote a letter about e-mails before an election that may have been technically warranted given the open ended nature of his initially probably inappropriate senate testimony, that s house testimony, a mouthful, and yet in so doing was trying to show those people wh
reporter: in the 296 e-mails the state department uploaded often redacted then secretary of state hillary clinton is seen receiving updates on the benghazi attacks for weeks after they claimed the lives of the u.s. ambassador to libya and three other americans on september 11 2012 after u.n. ambassador susan rice hit five sunday talk shows on september 16 dismissing the idea that benghazi was a terrorist attack. clinton s deputy chief of staff jake sullivan wrote her to say he found one line uttered by rice quote, troubling. it was the sentence on abc s this week where rice suggested the investigation into the attacks might reach a different conclusion. we know which embassies are more in danger than others. reporter: when the then undersecretary of state wrapped up a tough day of house testimony in october, asking did we survive the day. survey yes, sullivan replied. do you have a perception