Here are some of the key conversations you might have missed. The house took a major step toward potentially banning tiktok over concerns. Reporter for Social Media Giant ticktock, announce calling to split from its Parent Company or be shut down. He now heads to the senate. The u. S. House on wednesday, in a rare and overwhelmingly bipartisan vote passing the major that requires tiktoks Parent Company byte dance to sell the company within months. Would you say to people who cant understand that people watching silly dance videos is a National Security threat . We cant allow one of our foremost adversaries to have control over what is quickly becoming the dominant music and. Reporter many believe can and does store data from american users, partly because of a National Security law that requires Chinese Companies to share data and other information with the government. It begins to allow them to know how to influence americans. Reporter the annual Intelligence Committee says china used
Thank you for getting up Way Too Early on this tuesday morning. Morning joe starts now. Biden is back, baby haters are talking their [ bleep ]. They are too old, too weak, cant make it. He wont be able to stand. I see you, haters. I know who you are. [ laughter ] good morning and welcome to morning joe. It is tuesday, march 12th. Weve got a lot to get to this morning. Including Donald Trumps latest promise to his supporters who stormed the capitol on january 6th. Ithungarys Prime Minister is revealing how trump would handle the war in ukraine if he wins another term. Plus, well go through Donald Trumps flipflop on tiktok. Follow the money. The platform he used to ban well, he pushed a ban while he was president. It comes as the house is expected to vote tomorrow on a significant bill tied to the apps beijingbased parent company. Along with joe, willie, and me, we have the host of Way Too Early, White House Bureau chief at politico, Jonathan Lemire. And pulitzer prizewinning columnist a
execution of january 6th in this committee will get to the bottom of that. served as associate white house counts are under president barack obama, cofounder and executive protector micro a non partisan organization, dedicated to fighting efforts to undermine democracy, we all expect the next few days this will be voted out of the full house and then go department of justice and i think there s really open question, about what happens when this, lands on a mayor garland s desk, and you ve worked as a government, lawyer you worked in the way, as you ve sort of been around the circles of people that will be making the decisions, on this i m wondering, what is your perspective on it? i think the good side, is in the letter from white house counsel dana, remiss that rejected the claims of executive, privilege and turning over, documents she made clear that this is a unique an exceptional circumstance, and i think it s important to remember with the stakes are here. which is that stev
with subpoenas for documents and testimony relating to that riot, the matter is now set to go to the full house for a, vote possibly as early as this, week if it passes the house and it is expected to, a criminal referral will then be sent, to the u.s. attorney s office in d.c., which will decide whether or not it will proceed with a criminal investigation into bannon s lack of compliance. if he is ultimately convicted, bannon could face up to a year in prison, but before we get to, that which is a long way, off let s take a step back and look at the background, hear the january six committee has subpoenaed a whole bunch of trump associates for information, relating to the insurrection. there have been some high profile targets like bannon and lesser known subject with ties to various groups supporting trump, who may have been involved in the planning of that january 6th rally. the big one that the president spoke, up before the insurrection happened. some folks, the committee been
important, we have to take notice of the breath of what brandon tried to do, which is not come to, committee and mr. some kind of privilege, but claim that he doesn t even need to show, up he s somehow absolutely i m yun, from legal process, while others tried that too in the courts rejected that argument, it is rejected, here and i m confident it will be rejected by the justice department. in the fact that we re referring him for prosecution will get the attention of others, now he s imported his own, right he has very relevant information of the day before the insurrection, he was talking about all haul how is going to, breakthroughs in for those who had talked about wanting to be there during the time of the revolution, that here is another opportunity for them to be there for a revolution, so he s clearly got information, relevant to our committee our country, and also he s important example of what should happen if people refuse their lawful duty. i want to play you something se