to find the titan submersible grows by the hour. we ll also show you what it s like inside the titan and talk to someone who raised douts about its safety. and from ukraine, just how difficult the counteroffensive has been. the most urgent deadline there is for the five people you see here on the missing submersible. british businessman hamish harding, shahzada dawood and his teenage son, suleman, paul henry nargeolet, and stockton rush. they are now the subject of a multinational search involving military and civilian ships, aircraft, and expertise, which grew larger in size and capability today. the question is, is it enough and do they have time? this is new video from a canadian air force plane. the entire effort is running on hope that underwater sounds are coming from the titan. it s also running up against the sub s limited oxygen supply and the possibility locating a vessel the size of a large car in an area twice the size of connecticut will simply take more
60, more sounds from under the seat, as the race to find the titan submersible grows more urgent by the hour. we ll show you what it s like inside the tighten, and talk to someone who raised doubts about its safety. an exclusive cnn reporting from the front lines of, ukraine showing just how difficult the counter offensive underway has been. good evening, we begin tonight with the most urgent deadline there is, for the five people you see here aboard the ocean gate titan somersville, cussing somewhere in the north atlantic on the way to the wreck of the titanic. british businessmen hamish harding, british pakistani businessman shahzada dawood, and his teenage son, suleman, french maritime explore paul-henri nargeolet, and ocean gate founder stockton rush, they are now the subject of a multinational search involving military and civilian ships, aircraft, an expertise, which grew larger in size, capability today. the question is, is it enough, and do they have time? this is new
before, after 1973 and the yom kippur with the army and the government exchanged very similar accusations. well, we re going to have to leave it there. i m so sorry we re out of time, michael, but we will discuss. always good to be with you. thank you so much. and yasmin vossoughian picks up right now for chris jansing. hi, everybody, good to see you. i m yasmin vossoughian in for chris jansing. he went out as a member of congress. he went out in infamy. george santos expelled in an historic vote just hours ago. where does that leave republicans and then new yorkers in his district. we re live on capitol hill for that conversation. israel resuming an all-out assault on gaza launching hundreds of attacks on land from air and sea. plus, the new report raising questions about what israel knew about hamas s plans more than, get this, a year ahead of time. and then remembering the first woman ever to serve on the supreme court. we re going to honor the life of sandra d
Honored that recusal with regard to matters pending the Department Of Justice, but i just want to comment on what may have been on anybody elses mind or offer any opinion about that because its not for me to make those decisions. Well, it is exactly, i think, why Senator Schatz asked a whole series of questions about the scope of recusal, because i am a lawyer. Senator schatz may not be. He asked better questions than i did, but i also am having real difficulty understanding the scope of the recusal, its contours in definition, and i have an unresolved question about whether or not thats why the Attorney General failed to appear before us today, is to avoid having to answer direct questions about the scope of his recusal. I do appreciate and respect your appointment of a highly talented Special Counsel, and there have been questions from both sides that imply strong support for his independence and his conduct, and i appreciate the care with which you are answering my questions, but im
Charges brought by the house. I believe these documents are also of great importance to making sure senators have the information necessary to make a fully informed decision, this terribly weighty decision. The house has built a very strong case against the president. Maybe thats why leader mcconnell doesnt seem to want witnesses, at least not agree to them now. Maybe thats why the president is afraid, because the house case is so strong, that they dont want witnesses that might corroborate it. The evidence the house put together includes public testimony given under oath by numerous senior officials appointed by President Trump. These are trump 57. Teas were calling, not some partisan democratic. Some republican senators have said that, while the charges are serious, they havent seen enough evidence to make a decision. Thats one of the reasons i propose subpoenas for these witnesses for these documents, all directly relevant, from officials who have yesterday to testify during any sta