we don t want to come up on some arsenal where they are prepared and seriously injure or kill any of our law enforcement people, never mind these crimes these people would get away with going down the road if she creates this bill: on your experience, i.c.e. is targeting criminals, not gardeners and house painters, right? no question about it. bill: so, dubois will say i am looking out for the poor chambermaids who don t deserve . that is what she will say. now, you pointed to i made reference to this in the previous statement, title eight, u.s. code 1234. it is missed dubois in violation of federal law for doing what she did? if we could prove that she was able to assist somebody from getting away in the instance where i.c.e. was going, targeting somebody come and they can determine that this person got away, i would say absolutel absolutely, i would got to believe bill: you would say there could be a case made. can there be a case made against
things going on out there, we don t want to come up on some arsenal where they are prepared and seriously injure or kill any of our law enforcement people, never mind the crimes these people would get away with going down the road if she creates this o bill: yeah, if she lets them get away. in your experience, i.c.e. is targeting criminals, not gardeners and house painters, right? no question about it. bill: so, ms. dubois will say, i am looking out for the poor chambermaids who don t deserve to be scrutinized. that is what she will say. now, you pointed to i made reference to this in thew, previous segment, title 8, u.s. code 1234. is ms. dubois in violation of federal law for doing what she did? well, if we could prove that she was able to assist somebody from getting away in the instance where i.c.e. was going, targeting somebodyy and they can determine that this person, as a result, got away, i would say absolutely, i would got to believe bill: you would say there c
her to death. so, step back for a moment. one part of the country, led by president trump, wants to deport criminal illegal aliens and secure the borders so they can m get back in here. another part of the country doesn t want strict border enforcement and doesn t seem to care that criminals can defy deportation as many as eight times! so, what side are you on? one final thing. every time, and i mean everyha time, the subject of criminalna illegal aliens arises, the democratic party will not engage. instead, they fall back on the ruse that the illegal immigration crackdown is aimed at chambermaids and house painters. you hear that over and over andi over. in the case of daniel ramirez medina, there is certainly enough in play to investigate him further. is there not??
san francisco, with farmers come up with house painters, they ner would break it out, because we are only talking here about felons. kate s law is directed against criminals who have been convicted of heinous crimes. not people who paint houses and to come across. but the other side wouldn t see that, wouldn t give you that. it was an attack on migrants, attacking migrants, o reilly. i found that so despicable, did you? your argument is not with me. your argument is with harry reid, who is now in a blissful retirement. your argument is with a pot of democrats, for whom immigration is totally symbolism. anything that seems to be opposing illegal immigrants is seen as an issue that they cannot use politically. the democrats have made it very clear they always wanted immigration as an issue and not as a policy. well, those days are over. the republicans are now in
the majority of those are violent crime. that s right. 20% are property crime. and you have got 13% are drug crimes. 16% are drugs of which 12 of the 16 are drug dealers three.5% are drug users. and the users. and heather mcdonald. heather mcdonald. plea bargain. they plea bargain down from the dealing to the possession and they let them do it. they make it sound like it it s a guy with a friday night. it s a lie, a fraud, and a myth. it s being perpetuated by the president of the united states. here is another one, kate s law. can you believe these people out in san francisco saying that because i would like to have a mandatory sentence for somebody who defies deportation with an aggravated felony conviction that i m demonizing gardeners and house painters? this is what they are throwing out there? that is outrageous lie.