i will start with this. i will ask my caller sees if they want to comment as well. audible systemic failures. we don t try to compare, contrast, whatsoever. we laid out the basic facts as we were charged to do. what i said early on about law enforcement, the officers that no or should have known this wasn t active shooter situation should have done more. we are very clear on that. not every officer on the scene had that same information and had that same opportunity to comply with their training. one of the things this committee has not done, we are a three-person committee go through and determine which law enforcement personnel new what, what did they know and when they knew it. i think that that will take many months to go through all the different video, body camera footage and figure out, i think there are other investigatory arms trying to figure out what this person knew, when they knew it and what did they do with it. i think you will need all of that. we do say the
we know we did not have that here. you are asking why the information was told the way that it was. who, what, when. the failure to have an incident commander on the scene to receive information and communicate with the media, i believe, in part, led to some of the information reported inaccurately. representative from the committee. looking at maybe how information flows post the incident. there is a section in the report about information flow and how we believe it is incumbent upon law enforcement as they make reports to report what is verified, what is verifiable and what is not verifiable. when the chairman talked about multiple systemic failures, one of those is just the handling of infoinformation in this
committee would be happy to do that. just not today out of respect of what we ve been asked to do in the report that we have. hold on a second. name and to you are with. in outback. okay. thank you. in on mac. i will tell you, it is a great question. we spent 44 days looking at the facts to lay those out. each different officer connected to an agency can do their own internal review. to knew what and when. if somebody fails to exercise their training, somebody new there were victims and their being killed or dying and did not do more, i believe those
had that same information and had that same opportunity to comply with their training. one of the things this committee has not done, we are a three-person committee go through and determine which law enforcement personnel new what, what did they know and when they knew it. i think that that will take many months to go through all the different video, body camera footage and figure out, i think there are other investigatory arms trying to figure out what this person knew, when they knew it and what did they do with it. i think you will need all of that. we do say there was chaos on the scene and certainly, certainly, with the chaos, people should have asked why is there not an incident commander outside the building helping try and organize that. hold on a second. one of the things is the importance of an incident commander. and the information laid out.
have already been formed. the governor formed those early on. the speak e of the house formed the speaker of the house formed them at the same time. they have been working on this. we have baseline information we can report to the legislature, help them basically make decisions about systemic failures. i think each community can look at the things we have laid out in this report and make some determinations on how to prevent that from happening. i will tell you not i am brian and for john scott. a tax texas committee on the horrific may 24 the elementary school at uvalde. let s listen in. [inaudible]