Latest Breaking News On - House doesnt vote - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Brian Williams 20190925 08:08:00

what happened was so many house democrats came to the speaker and said this has reached the threshold for impeachment. we need you to make a statement. we need house democrats to make a formal statement. so politically, she was showing solidarity with them, while letting the committees still work out the exact process. in terms of that process and in terms of democrats commitment to not just opening an inquiry, but potentially bringing articles of impeachment and had some kind of vote on impeachment, how much now in terms of their political thinking on this, how much is going to depend on what happens when that transcript is released tomorrow? apparently what happens when the whistleblower s complaint is heard? how much will dictate whether this leads to democrats having a vote here? i think those are the most important things that will dictate whether or not that happens. the transcript, of course, is helpful. democrats have said that s simply not enough.

White houseHouse doesnt voteWhistle blower

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Brian Williams 20190925 08:00:00

vote but her saying it is that i can get the votes if i need it. say it unless she can, and all the players in this understand that which is why today was so significant. thank you both for joining us. that is all in this evening. breaking tonight, the house speaker wields the power of impeachment after months of keeping her caucus at bay. plus, the white house backs down and will let congress hear out the intel community s whistleblower complaint and see the transcript and how the shifting explanations could come back to haunt him and make him the third president in u.s. history to be impeached. good evening once again from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. i m steve kornacki in for brian williams.

House doesnt voteNew yorkNbc newsSteve kornackiBrian williams

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Brian Williams 20190925 06:51:00

it s more of a political act than a legal act because she is unilaterally saying now we re doing an impeachment inquiry, but she s not putting it to the house for a vote. recall for the last month or two the house judiciary committee under chairman jerry nadler has already been saying they ve been doing an impeachment inquiry, an investigation, and court papers and the like. and republicans have been saying it doesn t count if the house doesn t vote for it. so we re a little bit in uncharted waters here. at the end of the day, the constitution does not say there has to be a resolution. it doesn t say there has to be a committee investigation at all. it can do whatever it wants, and at the end of the day, an article of impeachment may or may not come to the house floor. it takes a simple majority vote to send it to the senate for a trial. jill wine-banks, i m curious what you make of it is significantly, extremely significant that the speaker of the house after all of this speculati

Impeachment inquiryHouse doesnt voteJerry nadlerJudiciary committeeUncharted watersDoesn tUs senateJill wine banksHouse floorCommittee investigationIt doesn tThe end of dayAl l

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Brian Williams 20190925 06:49:15

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Brian Williams 20190925 06:49:15
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

House doesnt voteOath of officeWhite houseImpeachment inquiryTexas house democratsHouse speakerWouldn tNewt gingrichOctober 1998The new york timesNbc newsCharlie savage

Transcripts for MSNBC The 11th Hour With Brian Williams 20190925 06:58:00

the senate would conduct the trial. the senate run by republicans, run by mitch mcconnell. interestingly you say in your article, i d like you to explain this, the senate it s not clear would have to conduct a trial? well, clearly the writers of the constitution envisioned that the next step would be the senate would conduct a trial, but there s no ednforcement mechanism. it raises the question of what happened if mitch mcconnell garlands this. remember in 2016, he refused to even hold a hearing or a vote on president trump s judicial supreme court nominee, merrick garland. what if he does that here or what they simply gavel the thing closed without hearing any evidence right away? it could be done. it s not clear what would stop it if they had the will, the power to do that without holding a real trial. as a matter politic, there s no sign the republicans are breaking ranks, in anywhere near the numbers that would be necessary to get to that

Us senateThe next stepMitch mcconnellHouse doesnt voteEdnforcement mechanismMitch mcconnell garlands thisMerrick garlandTrumps judicial supreme courtHoldinga real trial