Way. Thats all for now but ill be available for any questions that you may have. I have one. Sure. Actually, i probably have a couple. So this property was a small home at one time, and then ask you explain how this home became, i think it was 13 or 1400, and then it became more Square Footage and explain what the Square Footage that they are asking for . Sure. So i dont know the exact history of the development of this site over time. This us there used to be a small Carriage House at the time. At some point that was kind of subsumed with the other that has 100 lot usage. There have been a couple of lots that have been divided on steiner, and this happens to be the smallest of those lots. A home an addition was done going back to my reference before that you cant expand a nonconforming structure thank you do it within the buildable area. The portion of their home that is primarily in the buildable area and did that require a variance and exception prior. Id have to look real quick. I
Heard your presentation, i want to comment on it. The first thing is, i completely support revocation hearings. I dont think that the fact that we can speed up everything and get it out the door and it reminds me for when i used to work for kodak and people would run in and say, i have to develop this right now. And then you see its christmas pictures. Why did it take you that long to develop this but you need it now . Those are the jokes we used to have. One of the questions we used to ask at h. P. How do we know where we want to go when we dont know where were really at. And after hearing the presentation, that really hits me. And the reason is not because any of this is bad, but i think when i looked at the page here under process improvements, product entitlements. I started to say, a, is what we want to do, b, how we want to do. And c, how we want to do. D, what we want to do and its a mish mash of thoughts, all good thoughts. Theres an organization of 300 people. Some people do t
That are charging great rents but the experiences are not that great. I see a lot of opportunity to provide otherwise improvement to that corner, you guys all know the corner, we have a month to month rent with the bike shop that says basically free bikes on the outside of the building. Commissioner johnson. Thank you. You can have a seat. Thank you though. Ill be pretty short here. This project hasnt changed other than the agreement with the childcare facility from last time. I can still consider this a land use issue. The changes to the project makes it more of a residential project with transient occupancy and with the online projects, i try to side on the side of the project sponsor and sort of see the bright side of what is being proposed for us. On this particular one, i think there are issues with the lot and i dont think of it just as the dividing line, spoken about by various people in Public Comment but generally speaking with that corner lot with the elements of things makin
Item seven, 2 geneva avenue. Commissioner use authorization. Item eight, and 501 through 503 and 508 through 511, laguna street. Item nine at 123 west portal avenue, conditional use authorization and item 10, 1765 california street, conditional use authorization. I have no speaker cards. Ok. Thank you. Any members of the public who would like to comment on the consent items or pull frem the consent calendar . Seeing none, commissioner moore . Id like to ask item 10 to be pulled of con sent. I just have a few questions that i could not really discern from the staff report. Ok. Well hear that first on the regular calendar. Do i hear a motion . Oh, sorry. I make a motion that we approve the item from the consent calendar. Except for item 10. Except for item 10. Second. Thank you, commissioners. So, on that moex to approvement items under consent did you have a comment . Just a second. Ok. So, on that motion to approve items under consent, except item 10 , commissioner fong. [roll call] so