Isnt here. If if there wanted to be an audit done and that audit showed that that 90 floor was too high or not high enough, that might be be a way to go, but i think to put it as a ceiling put it as a ceiling would be dangerous. Okay. Rchltsz i yield. I have other questions for mr. Hamrick. There are six cases of misuse under your office, is that right . My office has conducted six investigations that were referred to us by the osc. There were ten total referrals, right . I thats the number. Okay. So where are the other four cases and whos investigating those . Because there was an allegation of auo misuse against the office of internal affairs, we are no longer our agents are no longer investigating those. I understand. Thank you. I want to go back in time to 2012 and i know the problem with the administratively and patrolable overtime is not a new one. Back then i think the president in his fiscal 2012 budget request included a legislative proposal that attempted to address this prob
The department of defense has loaned Us Lackland Air Force base in texas for hhs to house kids before hhs operably determines a legal guardian. Releasing fort sill in oklahoma for the same purpose. Hhs is also using that dod facility in ventura california to do with the processing of influx of people into south texas. We are also sending on Company Children to arizona for processing and then to hhs. Gsa is also assisting in the efforts to identify additional space. Number four, we brought on more transportation assets. The coast guard at my direction is loaning their assets to assisting in transporting the children from dhs to other shelters. I. C. E. Is also leading to additional charter aircraft. Number five, we are doing a prisoner screening for Health Reasons for all of those who come into our facilities in south texas. The office of Health Affairs and the coast guard are lending resources to this effort. Every child is provided a Health Screening on site. Number six, we call upon
Consider is how we can achieve permanent risk reductions, rather than continuing in the current preventive posture. Just as we have demonstrated that highly enriched uranium is not necessary for producing critical medical isotopes, and we can eliminate it from that technology cycle, can we apply the same principle to radiological sources . Not only torive further enhance security, but to reduce the size, complexity size and complexity of the overall problem. The centerpiece of this strategy is to engage in a worldwide effort to provide reliable, nonradioactive alternatives to the highest activity radioactive sources that pose the greatest risk. We will need to have the engagement and active participation from the Research Industry and medical communities, but the potential benefits removing the risk of a dirty bomb altogether are significant. Considering a range of incentives for replacement where commercially viable alternatives exist is something we are investigating. We are also col
Forsight and hfo foresight and his advocacy on this issue clearly helped people step up and move forward. Thank you very much. Mr. Trimble . I would just add that previously ga has done work on this area. We looked at u. S. Forces and how they were handling this issue in france and got some innovative ideas. We havent done the crossreferencing per se but we have looked at how other countries have tackled these issues. I guess it would be understandable that if other states, other nations, rather, have these devices that have radioactive materials in them, whether theyre mobile or stationary, and if other countries do not secure them well, and those materials were obtained, they could be used for bad purposes in those countries or maybe anywhere. What do we have to reduce the likelihood that if another country did not have did not secure their radioactive materials well, what assurances do we have with the way we protect our own borders and our ports of entry that well be able to detect
This committee, both perspectives is great. Whatever we do will impact business, it will impact individuals, will impact our competitive nature around the whole planet. With that, i yield back to the chairman. Chair recognizes mr. Clever. Thank you, mr. Chairman. To the Inspector General. There have been problems, obviously, with xm bank. Has there been something so egregious and monstrous that congress should give the xm bank a certificate of distinction . Offersly the decision if xm bank is still around is for congress to decide. All weve done is to look at some of the issues that were appearing to our bank operation. From the Law Enforcement side, weve been very active on that side. We had a hearing last year talking about Risk Management. We have done work on dealing with customers. We look at Economic Impact. All those aspects of the bank we thought needed to be addressed. Since then the banks been working with us and addressing those. Some recommendations still standing. There is