program. they don t have to sell their drugs to the 50 million seniors. of course they want to. so, it s an outrageous argument. if, under this argument, the government wouldn t be able to negotiate for doctors fees, or hospital fees, or reimbursements for other things. like what the va does, lawrence, they, rightfully, negotiate on behalf of the nations veterans and get much less expensive drugs. those are the kinds of prices we want to see for our seniors. let me ask the control room to do a split screen here. you don t need to see me, but it be good to see the senator and the list of drugs these ten drugs that are a couple of years away from being having the price controlled by medicare. senator, this strikes me as fragile. no republican votes for this whatsoever. why wouldn t the next republican president to do everything possible to stop this from happening? why wouldn t any republican senators and members of the house elected in the next
drugs under medicare. they don t have to be in the program. they don t have to sell their drugs to the 50 million seniors. of course they want to. so, it s an outrageous argument. if, under this argument, the government wouldn t be able to negotiate for doctors fees, or hospital fees, or reimbursements for other things. like what the va does, lawrence, they, rightfully, negotiate on behalf of the nations veterans and get much less expensive drugs. those are the kinds of prices we want to see for our seniors. let me ask the control room to do a split screen here. you don t need to see me, but it be good to see the senator and the list of drugs these ten drugs that are a couple of years away from being having the price controlled by medicare. senator, this strikes me as fragile. no republican votes for this whatsoever. why wouldn t the next republican president to do everything possible to stop this from happening?
work, but here when you look at the actual studies as i said, it doesn t make people work. if you put in additional requirements to what exists, it s just taking away food and benefits at a time where the economy is somewhat shakey and people need that, and here is the other thing. this actually is not going to save a lot of money. why don t we look at the big ticket items that are going to save a lot of money, such as the tax cuts to the very wealthy, such as the fact that our defense budget is over 50% of our discretionary spends, the fact we could have neutrality in hospital fees so hospitals don t charge more than your doctor s office for a medical procedure. that s where we would get big savings. sandra: if you cut defense spending with china building it up and the military at a break neck pace, do you not risk falling behind? we absolutely have to be strong in the pacific, and i m for giving taiwan more weapons,
Appeal court judges have ruled that the Information Commissioner has the right to examine records that public authorities claimed were outside the scope of access to information legislation.
In a judg.
Appeal court judges have ruled that the Information Commissioner has the right to examine records that public authorities claimed were outside the scope of access to information legislation.
In a judg.