it s like hoosiers in the sense that the hoop is 10 feet and it s the same thing no matter what court you are in but it s very different. it s not going to change her approach or what the evidence is going to be, but it does change a little bit in the sense that you are in a different place. it s a little less familiar. nancy, let s stick with the georgia case, if this is a base before you what are you going to be listening for in terms of some of the witnesses today, some of the evidence in terms of whether mark meadows has what we ve heard a lot, a colorable defense, has some legitimacy for moving this to federal court? i think the question is going to first depend on what the law is, what the standards are. if the standards are if the judge believes that the standards are low and there is some mushiness here because this is not an often used statute, whether or not it is colorable, whether that s a very low standard, colorable federal