where did all the defendant s blood go? while we re on that subject the defendant claims he was the only one yelling out there. all the cries for help were only him. decide whether it was him or trayvon martin or beet of them. had to be one of them. or both. but if he s yelling and if he s down and if he s got all this blood and he s swallowing the blood, how is he able to do all that? and why is there a consistent in terms of yells of help, help, help? why is is it muffled down? how is he going to talk? or is he lying about that? i will submit to you it s another lie. you saw that the hoodie jacket was checked. i m giving you quickly the dna
consistent with the can and had to do that. that button might have to do something with the way that sweatshirt is kind of hanging. it s a little big on him, but also that might affect the angle how much it s sticking out, the sweatshirt, you decide. state s exhibit 23. why is that important? see any blood on the victim s hands? state exhibit 24, do you see any blood on his hands? is there any dispute the defendant s mouth, nose i m sorry, he had some blood on it? how come there isn t any blood on the victim s hands? because the argument was made or suggested to you in temps of the cross-examination of the medical examiner. he had to wash his hands. y all didn t know what you were doing there. right at the scene, where was the blood?
see, track down trayvon martin, and then it just stopped working so he didn t put it in his pocket. i guess he was carrying it in his hand. that s the victim s phone, no dispute he was talking on the phone and the attempt to save his life, he was turned over. i show you that photograph because i want you to focus on this. he was speaking on the phone. he had earplugs, whatever you call them. state s exhibit 22 is a close-up of where the gunshot was and also this photograph button. one thing i d suggest to you might be important to note on that, there was a big deal made about the jacket or hoodie or sweatshirt, how it had to be
while we are on that subject, the defendant claims he was the only one yelling out there. so, all the cries for help were only him. you have to decide whether it was him or trayvon martin or both of them. had to be one of them or both. but if he is yelling and is down and has all this blood and swallowing the blood, how is he able to too all that? and why is there consistent yells, help, help, help. why is it muffled? why is he able to yell if the defendant claims the victim was how is he going to talk? or is he lying about that? i would submit to you, it s another lie. you saw what the hoodie jacket was checked, and there s no
least scratched up, if he was being picked up over and over, why is his jacket all right? the back of his jacket? you think about that? or is he exaggerating what happened? and that was the key ring and that s the one that was still on. state s exhibit 10 shows another angle in terms of the evidence out there. in terms of there apparently was some slope. we ll talk about the significance of that because based on what the defendant told poli police. this is showing state s exhibit 15, the body was covered up. that s the other flashlight the defendant had. i think he s told the police had stopped working or something. if you want to, check again his statements to the police. was he carrying it in one hand? why was he carrying it in one hand? i guess he took it out there to