because it is being challenged and we have to accept that and respond to this challenge, which i hope we will be doing in this debate. despite the hysterical reactions of the country can i think it s important to state that this is a properly constituted senior committee of the house as indeed the leader of the house did so in her remarks. it was asked to do a difficult but vitaljob and it discharged its duties with integrity and honour will stop it is our duty now, i believe, before this house to ensure that we support the members of that committee and we support the conclusions that they have come to after this detailed work. i believe also we should thank the members of the privileges committee because they have done the house of commons a very great service under the most intense pressure. instead of being thanked, they have found themselves traduced in the borisjohnson worshiping print and tv media, which has called into question their motives and their very integrity. t
attitude because it is in effect an excuse for appalling behaviour. i give way to the honourable gentleman. give way to the honourable gentleman- give way to the honourable rentleman. .,, ., ., gentleman. i m most grateful to the chairman of gentleman. i m most grateful to the chairman of the gentleman. i m most grateful to the chairman of the standards gentleman. i m most grateful to the l chairman of the standards committee. he and i took part in that debate as he will well remember on the 21st of april 2022 and i raised the question of knowingly mislead is because it wasn t included in the original nation which was then passed which led to the reference to the committee on privileges. but in the course of it i raised with him directly, but he certainly made the remark for which i paid credit, was the fact that intention is at the heart of this question. if you knock out the word knowingly, you knock out the word knowingly, you knock out the word knowingly, you knock out the