Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. No senior Punjab Congress leader was seen either at Navjot Singh Sidhu s residence here or at a court where the former cricketer surrendered on a Supreme Court order. India News | No Senior Punjab Cong Leader Turns Up at Sidhu s Residence, Patiala Court.
disagreed. here we see the evidence once again. it s going to spread everywhere. laura: when i said good, i m talking about good that someone is defending dave schapelle. i didn t know to the extent that they had to defend him. the arm was backwards there. it s open season in the eyes of many on the left on supreme court justices privacy. so everything is open season. it s horrific. what else do we have? when you weaponize language and said language, i disagree with can justified violence, you get to this position. now it s moved from entertainment to the political. abortion rightses are calling themselves ruth sent us. they re urging people to visit the homes of what they call six extremist catholics that set out to overturn roe, now they re posting videos and encouraging people to stop catholic churches this weekend in protest.
don t think in any way you need to short sell america on a strong nominee, when he s talking about someone like justice breyer, he s talking about someone who has an open mind and reaches consensus, but also is someone that has taken very strong stands for equal justice, including on the death penalty, and so many other things. so i really came away from it thinking the president has extraordinary nominees, that we, as the democrats on the judiciary committee, have been through a lot of hearings, on supreme court, from justice kavanaugh and amy coney barrett, to back to sonja sotomayor, and elena kagan, that we re united on getting a good nominee, and so is the president. i just think we have some excellent choices here. and also, we know, the attacks have already started against some of these nominees, we know that s part sadly of our politics today. but we re ready, we just say bring them on, because these
those cases had listened and they were presented with arguments in those cases that adhere to press department, in brown v board, adhere to plessy in the west coast hotel, adhere to atkins and adhere to lockner. if the court had done that in these cases the country would be a much different place. with me, elie the justices were in a wiesely way was trying to identify themselves as the brown versus board heroes. they are trying to wrap themselves in that because they understand that they are going against the vast majority of americans will when they subject women to the the sis attitudes of their state and
states, or states still could or presumably would continue to freely allow abortion, some states would be able to do that even if you prevail. viability it seems to me doesn t have anything to do with choice. if it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time? the fetus has an interest in having a life, and that doesn t change, does it, from the point before viability to the point after viability? this is important for you to understand. the supreme court has never agreed to hear a case over an abortion ban so early in pregnancy until all three trump appointees, justices neil gorsuch who sits in the seat stolen by republicans after the death of ruth baiter ginsburg, brett catch and amy coney barrett.