at harvard a black plicatae cream of the crop had a 56% chance while whites and asians with the same qualifications had a 15%. a black applicant had a higher chance to get in than a top asian or white student t supreme court ruled 6-3 that s unconstitutional racial discrimination probed by the equal protection clause t14th amendment. chief justice john roberts who authored the majority says this, quote. eliminating racial discrimination means eliminating all of it. the guarantee of equal protection cannot mean one thing when applied to one individual and something else when applied to a person of another color. roberts is saying, basically, you can t unfairly discriminate against whites in order to help blacks. all discrimination s wrong. harvard university made race a factor in every single step of of the application process, from the second they accepted the application to the second they accepted or rejected it, race was used in their decisions. the court says harvard s ad
homeless people across austin. the lone star state s getting san franciscoed and texans are ashamed. it is a landfill. this whole plays looks like what you re looking at right here. gains creek is right there at the bottom. this whole place looks just like this. i m ashamed, man. i m ashamed. jesse: their nature trails and parks, i ve been there, i ve walked there, they re gorgeous, have just been pock barked homeless tents. actually full on campgrounds for homeless. bodies lined up, needles everywhere, kids walk there. people are scared. all this junk is in the creek. it s in the trees, in the creek, everywhere. there s a generator right here. this whole place has a different feel to it now. it feels dangerous down here and it s never felt that way before. jesse: austin spent over 60 million on homeless, and the homeless population went up.