there are some supporters here. and he s wasting no time postin a list of things to make americ rate again. what is his bold national visio for. with the objective be a quantum leap in the american standard o living? our objective would be a quantum leap in the american standard of living, almost one third of the landmass of the united states is owned by the federal government, we should hold a contest to charter up to ten new cities and award them t the best proposals for development, and new shop at home ownership in in fact the american dream. you want bold, that s bold, as bold as using hot sauce to treat . that s not a suggestion. some people learn the hard way. we keep hearing about affordabl housing, but no one ever has a handle on that. that s because our cities aren built for adding that in the mix . it s time for news towns, planned wisely. when time could be a solution for the homeless by choice. sure, you could live off the land, but not on my front lawn. you c
the gavel, the house taking a break until 8:00 p.m. after kevin mccarthy lost his six the vote for speaker, republicans backing him saying enough with the nonsense, it is time to move forward so they can go after joe biden. they have gotten together and decided that they can only blackmail the republican conference in effect they are blackmailing the american people. it s because of their headlines about the chaos, this and that, yesterday our colleagues on the other side of the guy over tweeting their bags of popcorn that they had out, they love it. i plead with all, all of my republican colleagues, let cooler more rational heads prevail. i ve had a number of conversations with kevin, and basically said that this needs to break loose. he needs to make a deal, or he needs to step aside and give somebody else a chance to do that. judge jeanine: but the 20 plus republicans who oppose aren t giving up. i think the path is very difficult right now for kevin, at the core
handle on that. that s because our cities aren built for adding that in the mix . it s time for news towns, planned wisely. when time could be a solution for the homeless by choice. sure, you could live off the land, but not on my front lawn. you can t trap in front of my kids or piss in my yard. if you want to have a new city very maybe there s a city for that. freight after all, why should those only be for early immigrants. they live similarly and casey s people deciphered who can argue against this? since trump thought of it, probably everyone and the media pretty also talked about an ide that ted kennedy was way ahead on. flying cars. you know, i bet there are dozen
glamping. you can get a tent and live there, and even the outreach volunteers and the people that work for the homeless are saying, man, this is just a scheme, this is now, people are just doing it because they can t live above and beyond civil society, which i get. i understand what she is talking about, no boss, no bills, no mortgages, free meds, free meals, but there has to be some reciprocity to society, don t make our lives hell. you can have your commune in the desert, hell, i will help pay for that, but you can t be on the street or scare the crap out of our kids or make our lives a living hell come you don t want to live by our rules, but then you don t get to live with us. it s like the parents cutting off the drug addict and kicking them out of the house no matter how much they love them, cities have to do this. homeless by choice, they are not