us. the january 6th committee versus donald trump. new never before seen footage from insurrection day shows congressional leaders and the vice president scrambling to protect democracy and trump, the president missing in action. plus, dr. oz gives a new interview and concedes his bedside manner would be more passionate than his campaign rhetoric. would you ever talk to your patients like this? no. senate rival john fetterman had a stroke six months ago and dr. oz and his campaign team regularly question fetterman s ability to serve. a 25 days out election forecast. can democrats hold the senate? will republicans reclaim the house? a read on the big shifts and big races. butters first for us this hour, donald trump s trademark nonanswer to damning new evidence from the january 6th committee and to the committee s subpoena demanding trump testify. and turn over documents. a lengthy trump statement this morning gives no answer or reaction to the subpoena vote. instead,
thank you, david lee. was the department aware of her tiktok videos? senator, they re really quite precocious. homeland security question claimed ignorance if he knew the woman at the helm of this disinformation board. dana: amber heard will be back on the stand after a tense first day of testimony where she described the first time johnny depp allegedly hit her. bill: a man storming the stage against dave chappelle with a knife. is this also an attack on free speech, we ask? a trained man. was that will smith?
that are throttling this agreement before it has a chance to live. and if we do, then i think the coalition that has supported these sanctions, which includes many reluctant partners like china and russia, starts to unravel. it will be one thing if the iranians renege, if they cheat, then deal is off, with he n w not only resume the freeze, we add sanctions but i don t think we take steps unnecessary. the iranians know the minute they renege sanctions come flying out of the congress. what better way to show that than to show we re serious about it. we need to give them every leverage we can on these negotiations. let me ask you a homeland security question because i had the heads of the intelligence committees on last week, and both dianne feinstein and mike rogers said that they felt that
then deals off. we not only resume the freeze, we add sanctions. i don t think we should take steps that aren t necessary right now. the iranians know if, they don t know, they re stupid, and they re not stupid, the minute they renege, sanctions are coming flying out of the congress. a better way to demonstrate that than casting out the senate. we need to give them every leverage we can in these negotiations. let me ask you homeland security question. i had the heads of the intelligence committee is on last week. and both dianne feinstein and mike rogers said they felt the u.s. was less safe now than it has been. both because of the kind of versatile and widespread threat of terrorism. not just one group but a whole bunch of groups and because one or two people can do a lot of damage. i want to see if you agree with
[ cheers and applause ] speaker gingrich, 30 seconds, i have another line of questioning, go ahead. i d like to go back to the homeland security question, because it s important for us to confront it. i helped develop the model for homeland security. it hasn t been executed well. the fact is, we have enemies that want to use weapons against us that will lead to disasters on an enormous scale. the initial goal was to have a homeland security department to help us stand up to three nuclear events in one morning. we need to understand there are people out there that want to kill us, and if they have the ability to sneak in weapons of mass destruction, they are going to use them. we need to overhaul and reform the department, but we need some capacity to respond to massive events that could kill hundreds of thousands of americans in one morning. congressman paul, this same line. do you want to demolish tsa, what would exist in its place?