there are so many different moving pieces and parts.hr you can live in a fancy house making a lot of money in a low tax state. the treatment will be very different if you are living in a house in a high tax state. you asked me who the losers were, folks were making a lot of money living at her expensivete house and california, the winners are a lot of other folks but it is sort of hard to say in between. tucker: if i go to work every day and live off the wages that i make you are a lot better off. tucker: i m taxed at one rate. if i inherit a bunch of money and live off the dividends and the investments of the money i ve inherited and taxed at a lower rate. why is that fair and will not come closer into balance? i didn t follow the question. tucker: our taxes on labor are far higher than the tax on capital. if i inherit a bunch of money and live off the dividends of my investments i m paying a lot less than somebody who works. if you re making 50,000 in dividends, is it r
and that s the number i always go with, but that s not the real number, it sounds like. in a sense it is, but it would be going up if we legalized more people. tucker: because of chain migration, which applies to all legal immigrants, that means you have a net gain of a lot more people than just that every year.l the long-term effect is enormous. for instance, the amnesties in the senate they are talking about, dream amnesties, they would amnesty 2 to 3 milliononre people, bigger than even the reagan amnesty of 30 years ago. double that number for the future over the next, say, ten or 20 years would come in because it s like remember there was an ad back in the 80s, a shampoo ad where a girl loved the shampoo so much she told two friends. they told two friendslo and so on and you had these multiplying images of her, that s what this is. this is, we give a green card to an immigrant. he sponsors two relatives. they sponsor two relatives. tucker: it s so dishonest. dan, how
will defend it on free-speech grounds, completely disingenuous. tucker: what do you think would happen if nfl players did this to the mexican flag? if they said mexico has a long history of mistreating its minorities, which it does, as you know. we are not going to stand for the mexican flag and we will talk during the anthem. how do you think msnbc would respond to that? they would regard that as absolutely disgraceful. the point here is identity politics is all about the old leninist thing, who, whom. who is doing what to whom? it is all right to trash icons of the american inheritance. in the same way that for the dallas school board to propose getting rid of anything named after madison, jefferson, and franklin is fine. so it s okay to come up with your own way of respectingan the american flag. it s nothing to do with whether
taxpayer support for their stadiums. the stadiums, often privately owned, operated for profit, are routinely financed by s tax-free bonds usually reserved for public infrastructure. the nfl enjoys a special exemption, you pick up the tab and they mock the things that you care about, just so you know. meanwhile, president trump has continued to lob attacks at the league, the football league, predicting imminent disaster if they continue to let protests happen during the national i anthem. the nfl is in a very bad spot. you cannot have people disrespecting our national anthem, our flag, h our country, and that s what they are doing. in my opinion, the nfl has to change or, do know what s going to happen, their business is going to go to hell. tucker: mark steyn knows something about powerful organizations going into to decline. he s been writing about europe for decades. mark steyn joins us tonight. mark, it does seem like a kind y of perverse system where u.s. taxpayers help make nf
giving me this propaganda points that i hear every day. they don t reflect the conditions of the country outside of the zip codes you and i live in. that s not true. tucker: 95 they are not working. the unemployment rate the unemployment rate is wisconsin is 3.7%. tucker: the unemployment rate is different from the reality of work. if you have 95 million people who are not working, and some cases for good reasons, a lot of cases they are on disability, that is not good for your country. it may not be reflected in an employment rate, it s reflectedt in the death rate of opiate o.d. is that immigrants fault? tucker: people have seen their wages decline at the lower end. workers.born immigration is one part of that. why don t you just admit it? what we know from studies that we ve done, my own organization has done is that the impact on the lower end of the workforce with the rates of immigration we had is demonstrable, there is no question about it. tucker: then we a