similar question and ceo see mark zuckerberg said any time someone to hurt others. he is also concerned about addiction to the social media site. as a dad, do you worry abouts social media addiction as a problem for america s teens? my hope is that we can be idealistic but have a broad view of our responsibility. tucker, we ll get more from zuckerberg tomorrow when he sits down for day two. he has certainly been very frank and hisnd responses and a little obtuse about specifics, which makes the lack of understanding of exactly how facebook works in our understanding of it very clear. tucker: thanks for that, brett. we appreciate it. senator john kennedy of louisiana was one of the many senators who spoke to zuckerberg today. here s part of it. here s what everybody s beenu trying to tell you today, and i say this gently. your user agreement socks.
they are not a monopoly, tucker. tucker: i have worked let me give you the following number. facebook and google control over 90% of digital ads. that means if you run news or anything else that is ad supported online, you re beholden to them. they control the market completely. why is that not a monopoly? if you want to say to monopoly for digital ads. if you want to say it s a monopoly for political content, it s not. tucker: digital ads are what supports all online news coverage apart from the nonprofits. that is the whole you control the outcome you control the company. tucker, are you worried about a monopoly in the digital ad business or a concentration of political power? tucker: i don t think there is a distinction. i am worried about both come with a total inability of the congress to respond to a looming threat to its own legitimacy from facebook and google. am i being insane here, roger? i m on your site on this issue. at the end of the day, the
and i can t wait for ten years from now when i get to talk to them again and see, like, who they are. theseare heading back home.y oil thanks to dawn, rescue workers only trust dawn, because it s tough on grease yet gentle. i am home, i am home, i am home
hated the bill of rights, those. if you listen closely tonight, you can hear the faint applause from heaven of this country s founding fathers, who bequeathed to us a nation where thes rule of law is supreme. we are a nation of laws. tucker: yeah, the founders wanted to know, did the money go to stormy daniels? what happened to stormy danielst jonathan turley is a professor at george washington school of law and he joins us tonight. i think i m a professor, you are one of the trustworthy people in this conversation. i don t know what your politics are. but i trust her legal views. what do you make of this raid on the president s lawyers offices? part of this is of the cohen is making, and the fact that cohen tends to blur his relationships between being a lawyer, a fixer, a friend, a business partner. that is dangerous under any circumstance. in particular dangerous if you
to be asking about this and anybody who does i am a living example is shouted down and called a tool is putin. it s s a insane. i applaud you for feeling the umbrage tucker: i m attacked all the time. i i don t care. i care about when and where we commit american troops. i have a son who is 21. it s not a joke. it s not a question of committing troops, sure, there will be troops. we are talking about degrading their air force, degrading the helicopters, doing something we didn t do tucker: what does degrading mean? having so many of them tucker: plus not use euphemisms. lets blow up airplanes and helicopters, if there are people in it, so be it. they ve made their choice, aligned with assad. these are the very people who are dropping i think we have had photographic evidence dropping chlorine bombs on civilian populations. do i feel badly about that? no. should we be doing it? yes. tucker: what s the goal? we take assad out don t tell