along when it s not complementary to him. if he really cannot sustain the good relations with russia by the fall, he can say i m canceling the meeting. i think you also have the question of whether there will be developments in the mueller investigation that makes such a meeting even possible. then you have the republican blow back. one of the things we do know that the mike pompeo that the president did not have a good performance in helsinki. pompeo would not say publicly, dan coatings did. he said if the president had
coming. incomprehensible is another word that fits. the american side is still trying to sort out the president s helsinki mess. no one but the president and putin can tell us what the president might have promised burlington h during his meeting. and everyone on team trump says that putin directed cyber attacks on the united states continue. yet the president who just gave putin a global stage in helsinki now see weak is the global verdict on the president s performance in helsinki. of the but he sees it very, very differently. getting along with president putin, getting along with russia is a positive, not a negative. with that being said, if that doesn t work out. i ll be the worst enemy he s ever had. the worst he s ever had, and i think he knows that. and i ll be his worst nightmare.
down on what he says is the rationale for the meeting in the first place. i don t think anybody in the foreign policy establishment would working together on syria and all the things they talked about for about five minutes in that news conference before he pivoted to russia meddling and interference and how he didn t actually buy that it had occurred. that would be a good thing and i think to the degree that he can argue that this is a policy that i want to pursue, i think it was successful in helsinki and i would think it would be professional to follow up on that. otherwise all people have is two hours and 10 minutes where he is alone in a room with putin, nobody knows what he agreed to, the white house has refused to brief any one of us who covered that meeting on what actually happened there, so all he can really do is sort of act publicly like this was a sort of a big mark of progress and he needs to follow up and keep it going. that s the only argument he has at this point.
could have cost of it the home meeting and. this is a village with bright decent intelligent cosmopolitan people who want to just sit idly by and see how the community is split down the middle. in this hype and as christians for freedom we have freed this bell from the signs of a time that was full of guilt and to be us we did that because of our responsibility before god in the face of dismay and to strengthen our village community. yeah and so the bell is ringing with the swastika now and the talk about this story which has gotten a lot of attention around the world is my colleague brady so the question that struck us is how did that nazi bill get inside the church to begin with do we know a lot of these bells of being discovered quite recently that was quite out of control they say several were found at once last year and a lot of them were set in various churches in the early one nine hundred thirty s.
adviser, j.d. gor ddon, he and others met with the russian ambassador during the republican convention in cleveland last july. according to j.d. gordon, the me meeting occurred during it. gordon said he and other advisers explained how they would like to see and the campaign would like to seibert relations between u.s. and russia. all this is important because gordon says he was part of a trump campaign effort to put a change in the republican party platform that advocated against the arming of the ukrainians and the fight against the prorussian rebels. that was a hot topic at the time. j.d. gordon tells me, at no time during the conversations was there talk of a quick proquo and in exchange for doing this at the convention, the trump campaign was hoping for help from the russians. he said nothing like that was