Doors the complex offered no explanation. Roe so i went to the manager of the properties to ask why. They couldnt answer but the cmha leader i was redirected to says she didnt know locks and keys were being changed. Residents say its what they were instructed to do. Im on my way right now to go get my keys. And here a letter we got the Housing Authority instructing all residents that their keys and locks would change today and tomorrow. When they changed the lock, you have to walk down to get your key so that means youre leaving your door unlocked to go get your key and i was calling but they say sorry for the inconvenience but thats how theyre doing it. Cmha also manages other properties 53hundreds total units including 600 in Winton Terrace where residents also tell us their locks are going to get changed too again they say no explanation. They probably could have offered a lot more information and if thats the case then be honest about it and let us know so that people can be aware
Updatesbring you throughout this News Conference. You can also watch a live event channel. First, i want to dig into the story. It is jobs thursday. Being released early. We are all off for july 4. Will we see are worse with economic numbers . The good, the bad, and the uncertain. Editor isics discussing the surplus the u. S. Is facing and why it is not necessarily a bad thing. First from you on what we can expect from june. The good is we are likely to see labor market rebounds continue. Pace of that, but the Jobs Creation is the fastest in 15 years. You mentioned the consensus. The fifth be consecutive month of over 200, which we have not seen since the end of 1999, the beginning of 2000. The forecast is being ratcheted up after yesterdays surprising report. 281,000 jobs were created in june. The interesting thing is, so far this year, they have consistently undercounted the labored up hartman figure. Better than expected number. That is the good news. Maybe we can hope for signs of
What we are saying is that the problem is getting worse. The problem is getting worse in part because of the scope of the attacks has gotten enormous. Companies are experiencing intrusions where 100, 200, 300, 500 servers are being compromised possibly for a small attack or possibly a large attack in terms of the amount of information taken out of the network but the scope of the machines affected is so enormous that the cost is rising into the five, 10, 20 milliondollar range just in terms of hard costs and then there can be costs that run into the hundreds of millions of dollars. So from a Corporate Governance perspective its very hard for companies in advance to prepare themselves for that level of attack. Id love to talk about as we go on a conversation about what that means for a Small Company if you are headed that way and those kinds of costs. Fill up what right now in your mind currently is the biggest problem or issue when it comes to corporate security . The biggest problem w
It and it sort of became a status symbol to know what they what they care quality and care enough about your health that you are checking your smart phone every hour to see how the numbers clocked in. This has become a very present political issue for the leadership. I think because it isnt so much about the care quality and it really is about the bargain, the underlining bargain whether the government is fulfilling its obligations to people. And you talk to people that have no interest in being overtly political because being political in china is dangerous and costly. But they dont see it as a political jester did you get interested interested as a health issue because you are worried about your kids. So i think you saw there is a reason why he earlier in the year they primarily declared a war on air pollution and that is because this is not that they woke up and decided that that is an inherent good its because they realized that there is a fundamental political appeared to have to
Youre going to get funded. What is the chance the grant is going to get funded . Its about one in six. Traditionally it has been one in three. In the Cancer Institute it is one in 10. Its even lower. You might say we were funding too much stuff before, and we werent putting a tight enough filter on this. The filter is rigorous peer review by experts in the field. Went back and looked. This was in Heart Disease research, but i imagine its true across the board. I can 2001 we were funding a third of the grants back in 2000 when we were funding a third of the grants. Does a grant in the 10th percentile turnout more productive than a grant funded in the 25th percentile . It is. Viewed, so is one better than the other . What happened . Peerreviewed, so is it better than the other . There is not a difference anyone can tell between the 10th percentile and the 25th percentile. They are both great. That shows we are living have to grade science on the table right now. Just at this moment of gr