comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Hollyfrontier cheyenne refining - Page 3 : comparemela.com

SCOTUS Decisions on Voting Restrictions and Nonprofits

Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (No. 19-251),  Minerva Surgical v. Hologic (No. 20-440),  Johnson v. Guzman Chavez (No. 19-897),  PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey (No. 19-1309),  Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation (No. 20-543),  HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining v. Renewable Fuels Assn (No. 20-472) In the final day of OT20, the Court handed down its two biggest decisions of the term: In  Brnovich v. Arizona (No. 19-1257), the Court held (in a 6-3 decision by Justice Alito, with Justice Kagan leading the dissent), that two of Arizona’s recently enacted voting restrictions do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and that one in particular (an anti-ballot harvesting measure) was not enacted with a racially discriminatory purpose; and in 

Supreme Court RFS ruling favors small oil refineries

In a ruling announced June 25, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered an opinion in HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. Renewable Fuels Association, which overturned by a vote of 6 to 3 the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision that in order to qualify for a hardship exemption under the Renewable Fuel Standard, a small refinery must have received uninterrupted, continuous hardship exemptions for every year since 2011. Although it does allow for refiners to apply to extend RFS exemptions that have lapsed, it does not change the 10th Circuit decision components of the 10th Circuit’s ruling that refiners must still prove economic harm directly related to compliance with the RFS and that EPA cannot use RIN costs as a cause of economic harm while simultaneously admitting RIN costs are recovered in the refiner’s crack spread.`

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.