Rally, talk about a turnaround. South korea, hong kong, japan investors moving away from haven place. Remember, china had been quite an out performer. The hang seng currently up 3 . We are hearing chinese buyers are buying up those stocks in hong kong. Lets look at where futures are setting up. We see futures pointing to a higher open. It has been a volatile right. Ride. Futures volatile equity futures down about 1 despite jumps in the s p 500 and the dow. Aide, saying that the deal may not be up and running just yet. Flip the page and look at where we are, the kiwi dollar tokening further, starting buy bonds to stimulate the economy, and look at that, down 1. 7 . It is moving just like the stock market. People were saying bitcoin was a haven play. for more context in the markets, david ingles our coanchor joins us. David, could we say this is the end of the route, or a bear market rally . David it is hard to say if this is the bottom. Once markets stop reacting, that is when you know
Tomorrow. There are two definite narratives being played out. To repeat the status quo for taiwan and that is sent autonomy, semi independence from china. Or more integration with the mainland economy. We will preview it coming up this hour and all morning. Yvonne we will see you soon. He does speak with the legislator at large. David lets get a quick check of your markets right now, 30 minutes into the session. About an hour into the taiwanese session. We should still be above 12,000. 2. 5 of the25 is is 28year high. Dont get too excited. Seere continuing to pressure coming into this friday. Jobs numbers are coming out later so that is fun to watch as well. Asare losing some momentum we head into the thick of things. Take a look at the currency markets and then we will talk about futures as well. You and pushing toward 1. 0. Chinese bonds are seeing a steep drop in yields. Su we will start out with the latest on boeing, critical messages from 2017 about the jet have been released to a
Volker saying i spoke to the president and ive spoke to the ukrainians, neither of which believe aid was conditioned, neither of which believed that the president was requiring it. And ambassador sondland, which said no one on the planet told him that that was the case. Thats the sole evidence. Ambassador sondland believed a meeting was conditioned upon investigations, ambassador volker who i think is a man of very significant integrity said that was not the case. Even if ambassador sondland is correct, that somebody and dr. Hill, you testified, and again its hearsay, you dont know, that supposedly mulvaney told him that, because he didnt testify to that, but lets say somebody besides the president told him that, you guys want to be the laughing stock of history to impeach a president of the United States because he didnt take a meeting. Oh, please, dear god. Please undertake that. Now, mr. Holmes, i got to tell you. Is there a question for dr. Hill . Mr. Holmes, in your testimony, you
Thank you, dr. Hill, mr. Holmes for your years of service to this country. And i appreciate yall being here today. Throughout this process i have said that i want to learn the facts so we can get to the truth. So why are we here . Because of two things that occurred during the president s july 25th phone call with ukrainian president zelensky. The use of the phrase, do us a favor, though, in reference to the 2016 president ial election and the mention of the word biden. I believe both statements were inappropriate, misguided Foreign Policy. And its certainly not how the executive current or in the future should handle such a call. Over the course of the hearings, the American People have learned about a series of events that in my view have undermined our National Security and undercut ukraine, a key partner on the front lines against russian aggression. We have heard of u. S. Officials carrying uncoordinated confusing and conflicting messages creating doubt and uncertainty in kyiv at
The meeting will come to order. Chair now recognizes the Ranking Member or their counsel for the first round of their 45minute questions. I thank the gentleman. I want to get a few basic facts on the table of individuals that were involved in the 2016 election just to see who you know and who you have met with. So i will start with you, mr. Holmes. Have you met with or do you know Alexandra Chalupa . Could you turn your microphone on. No. Do you know nellie ohr . Have you met with nellie ohr . No. Bruce ohr . No. Glenn simpson . No. Thank you. Same question for you, dr. Hill. Do you know or have you met with Alexandra Chalupa . No. Nellie ohr . No. Bruce ohr . Only in the course of my previous position as a National Officer that he presided over the meetings i attended. A long time ago . Yes. Glenn simpson . No. Dr. Hill, in your testimony you said that in your deposition, excuse me, that Christopher Steele was your counterpart at one time. Is this correct. That is correct, yes. You te