Published to this point to support the fiscal feasibility finding and with these projects the port and city staff will pursue policy approvals with a term sheet with fiscal approval. It was the staffs suggestion to separate the two and really the fiscal feasibility finding, again which jennifer will speak to, is necessary to start Environmental Review, and i think were all aware of the aggressive schedule that this project is under taking, and we want to make sure at the staff level we are maximizing the Time Available for Environmental Review. Thats a important component of this project so getting passed fiscal feasibility and starting Environmental Review with all of the inputs peter was just talk about is really going to maximize the publics opportunity to understand the project in all of its complexity. The next phase of the negotiation is really going to final liezing that term sheet and the term sheet will typically articulate all of the business terms of the transaction. We hope
Of clarity understand whag is going on in the land use realm, the terminal and the projects and mission rock at one side and understand what all of these things or some of the muni routes coming fall into place. So just a sample of some of the outcomes of the workshop. We had six maps and summaries. These were they written on and saw gaps and things needed to happen. Its hard to read it but its there and on the website and if you look on piers 3032 you will see this but there is a list of comments so we know the transit and parking issues. Thats helping us make sure as we work with engineers theyre getting the input from the people that live and work about this area and the general responsibility in fixing transportation solutions, but the next steps and were very much at the beginning of the assessment, are the workshops on december 4. One comment we heard loud and clear give us land use information to match the transportation information so we have maps that will be layered on top of
Either Public Transportation or some other venue, and what we have done is we have intentionally designed a number of egress points that will take people to their prime and we have this that allows people to walk around to think what theyre doing next and not be creating a lot of dense pedestrian traffic right on the street edge. And just by comparison you can see the red dots on the right of the two entry and exit primary entry points into the arena and you can see that green plaza and the distance that those points are from the embarcadero. In contrast if you look at the and this is detailed view of brandon street. Were proposed single entry point in and out of the garage. You can see that in blue and these lines are in yellow and more importantly and coming from the upper terraces that eliminates that point of conflict at bryant street so we are studying this in detail and at this point i will hand to the more detailed transportation presentation. Thank you thank you. Good afternoon
Quinscy lat mer and i live on Fourth Street a few blocks away from the site. I cant help but be outraged. I never heard Something Like this such blatant disregard for the law, the initial dust problem and the police having to called out working without permits and ignoring the stop work orders. It is crazy, if you dont take action here, you need to take action, i cant believe this is happening. I think that it is very least you can revisit the issue and see if there is anything that you can do under the law to bring him to justice. This is just crazy. Thank you. Thank you. Any other Public Comment . Okay, seeing no other Public Comment, commissioners, i believe that the inspector duffy would like to come back . Yes, please. Yes, commissioners, just in answer to your question regarding the Health Department, we found something on the city website that is the Health Department do have a Hazardous Waste Site Assessment and mitigation and it is mainly for leaking underground storage types
Property and is you a violation, and they were breaking up concrete pads as well. And i believe then that we did issue a permit for temporary shoring since the last hearing. Just wanted to add that. Thank you. Mr. Duffy one was issued. We issued one and another one for doing excavating and that was after the hearing as well. The nov for the paint, was for not testing . Well, they were removing, they were doing exterior lead, disturbing the paint on the exterior of the building like without the proper procedures. So they were. They didnt have any tarps down and there is a whole ordinance in our Building Code about that and when the inspector from our led Abatement Program went there and they gave them a 2500 penalty. In terms of that process, but has it been proven that it was lead paint. It could be. But the nov related to not following the appropriate process. Correct, that is right. Yes. Mostly mitigation, taps, etc. And when the gentleman mentioned earlier how often is sfpd called i