on the supreme court overturned roe v. wade. in that explosive decision, they not only overturned that landmark decision, the court also galvanized liberals and triggered backlash at the polls. and today, they also triggered counter-protesters. while the march began as a response to roe, we don t end as a response to roe being overturned. why? because we re not yet done. i am here. it is to show that we will not let america be bullied out of the right to abortion. everything that happened before roe, that was just the preseason. [ chanting: abortion is essential ] not when roe will be reversed, but when. our work just began. it felt more pressing this year. at this point, we no longer have a constitutionally protected right to abortion. the landmark decision from the supreme court overruling roe has not only sparked pushback from the left, it has also given rise to a growing fear and confusion among conservatives as they struggle to define the future of their move
that becomes harassing. and at some point in that pattern of conduct, a judge or a group of judges become frustrated. there s a waste of court resources, and they will use rule 11 sanctions to tell that litigant, you ve got to quit doing this. but it takes a lot for judges to reach that threshold. i think that s what happened here. the court is out of patience, it may signal to other courts that this is now one of those annoying litigants who brings repeated cases that are meritless. and in the context of this particular case, right, this is trump suing hillary clinton, the dnc, others who are members of the dnc, but also individual fbi agents, and saying that they created a false narrative about his campaign s willingness to engage with russia during the 2016 campaign. and he files this after the senate intelligence committee, which is led by republicans at the time, issues a bipartisan report that concludes that paul
she s had success against trump in the past. and she is clearly on a path to move forward very aggressively here. joyce, stay with us. up ahead, a top republican has been caught celebrating voter suppression and there are calls for accountability tonight. but first, let s get into the scotus leak investigation. there are new questions about the justices interviews. e justs i realize i m no spring chicken. i know what s right for me. i ve got a plan to which i m sticking. my doc wrote me the script. box came by mail. showed up on friday. i screened with cologuard and did it my way! cologuard is a one-of-a kind way to screen for colon cancer that s effective and non-invasive. it s for people 45 plus at average risk, not high risk. false positive and negative results may occur. ask your provider for cologuard. (group) i did it my way! hey guys, detect this: living with hiv, i learned that i can stay undetectable with fewer medicines. that s why i switc
only the nine justices, if i m chief justice roberts, i would say, we should all do it, you know, hand me the pen, hand me the affidavit, i m going to sign it right now, because it s both for reasons of fundamental fairness and for reasons of optics, right, for a court that attempts to be an institution that the public has confidence in and that has really been rocked by legitimacy concerns over the past year and by public opinion polls that are at the lowest they ve ever been, you would think the justices would want to clear the air and reassure the american public that the imposter is not in the supreme court building. you would think. joyce, steve has hit on the elephant in the room. there has been reporting from the new york times about a coordinated influence campaign that targeted the justices and in fact, there had been an earlier 2014 leak in the hobby lobby contraceptive case. given all of that history and
manafort, when he was the campaign manager, is sharing polling data with his russian connections. so it s really tough to view this lawsuit as anything other than meritless. so, it s tough to read this as anything other than meritless, and it also suggests that donald trump took this to heart, because today he pulled his lawsuit against new york ag letitia james. what does that mean for the actual case that james has brought against trump in new york state? yeah, so i should say i m maybe a little bit more skeptical about his motion to voluntarily dismiss the case than some folks are, because he s dismissed it without prejudice. that means that he s free to re-file it at any point in time. but this was clearly the smart thing for him to do. it was in front of the same judge who sanctioned him yesterday. it s not tough to think that sanctions could be coming here. i think james case will proceed on its own merits. she is a smart, tough prosecutor. she has a good case.