will they come out now and denounce that. you said they are not playing to this? well, you know, again, they are focused on their own races. i don t think they will respond to every presidential tweet or this ad. i think at this point, they are focusing on their messages and trying to block that out as best as they can. now the steve king issue, i suspect many of them will denounce his comments. they haven t yet. let s hold on about that. no the to cut ynot to cut you o. did you finish your thought? i had difficulty hearing the ad. hoards of people knocking
you have to see it and hear it. it is disturbing images. hoards of people knocking over barriers and this horrible guy convicted cop killer mouthing things in court and smiling. it just every racist immigrant trope thaw can think of is in this ad. and the president saying this is democrat s fault. this is what they ll do if we get elected. the people who are running, what about republicans who are running, what about republicans in washington, will they say anything about this? should they? i think on the steve king, they will say something. they are most likely to be asked about that. and i think steve stivers said. what he said today. in part to single out the republicans run away from the
of the president s law and order society and using this notion of who was coming here and who else democrats let in. i had to check my calendar to figure out what year i was in. it s clear as dana talks about, it s not the covert methods, but the avert uses of trying to show that the democrats are not law-abiding or law and order. that the president s party and the republicans are instead. you see this from time to time going on and on. it s disturbing to see. you look at the rest of the video and i don t want to play it and get free advertising to those out there, but if you look at the rest of it, you see hoards of invaders threatening to come in and tearing down walls and fences and threatening the american people. it s pretty awful. two things. trump himself is nationalizing this election around issues that he personally cares about. i don t think there was a lot of coordination with the senate and house campaigns on this.
border where there is no need, there is no threat to an invasion of the hoards coming in from latin america, which is a joke, and they are of limited utility anyway because of the constitutional issues involved here as to what our active military can and cannot do. and so, it s clear to me that he s using our military and our troops in a very political way that really casts a lot of questions about the competency of his leadership and as a former soldier, someone 50 years ago today, jake, i was in vietnam. r 50 years ago. i know the kind of sacrifices these men and women are involved with every day and their families, and to use them as political pawns like this, as a complete fabrication, is really wrong. you mentioned invading hoards
formula enemy of the people was specifically introduced for the purpose of physically annihilating real or imagined opponents, and hugo chavez, you tkpw guessed it, called his political opponents enemies of the homeland. for example, in 1884 a u.s. senator of michigan painted poor immigrants as the goths and vandals and come only to lay wisconsin and degrade and destroy, and my grand parents were later immigrants in that region. and then the talk about the chinese invasion, and the supreme court wrote in its decision about the vast hoards of chinese crowded in upon us, and one of the founders of the