more times. the water district is suing the sell ek s for $21,685 for wrongful conduct. it warns the district may suffer more damage if the conduct continues and the water district wants it to stop now asking a judge for an instunks to keep away from their water. we are asking them to stop. again, it is not equitable. not fair for current kust more base. those water users invested in the system. on top of that in this particular case we are seeking damages related to the cost of the research, reconnaissance we ve done on this matter. the attorney for the water district told me he that tom sellic s attorneys have come it a tentative agremt in this case. but that the water board has it approve that agreement and they he don t meet until wednesday. we reached out again to sell ek s he representatives. we he have not heard anything back. not on this matter or the original matter at hand.
changing things like ceo compensation. to get way from incentives that are almost irresistible to maximize their own income in the game you are talking about so their interest is more aligned with not just the expectation side of shareholder value but with building real value over time? well, matt, optimally i would get rid of stock based compensation. i would be like the nfl and say let s give them lots of incentives but on things have doing with the real game. so give them incentives on increasing market share or increasing kust more satisfaction or increasing sales. whatever is important for that company. if you can t do that, i would say make sure any and all stock base compensation is of the form that does not vest until three years or more of a the retirement of the executive in question. so that they can t play short term games which is what i m afraid they are doing a lot of these days which is contributing to the stock market volatility.