adviser to her when she was formulating our policies liz truss. but the parallel with the 1981 budget was complete a false, and we have a situation where supply policies and sensible policies that support growth require an increase in borrowing. support growth require an increase in borrowing- in borrowing. sorry, but margaret thatcherwas in borrowing. sorry, but margaret thatcher was not in borrowing. sorry, but margaret thatcher was not in favour - in borrowing. sorry, but margaret thatcher was not in favour of i in borrowing. sorry, but margaret thatcher was not in favour of lots| thatcher was not in favour of lots of borrowing. those of us to remember the 1980s remember that very clearly. she remember the 1980s remember that very clearly- very clearly. she borrowed as well as anybody very clearly. she borrowed as well as anybody else- very clearly. she borrowed as well as anybody else. you very clearly. she borrowed as well as anybody else. you have - very clearly. sh
ratios. ii but we will not go to the bigger ratios. ,., , but we will not go to the bigger ratios. ,. , ., ., ratios. if the parents have a one-year-old ratios. if the parents have a one-year-old and ratios. if the parents have a one-year-old and it - ratios. if the parents have a one-year-old and it is - ratios. if the parents have a one-year-old and it is one i ratios. if the parents have a l one-year-old and it is one to ratios. if the parents have a - one-year-old and it is one to three one year old and it is one to three ratio, that they pay more? hot one-year-old and it is one to three ratio, that they pay more?- ratio, that they pay more? not in our ratio ratio, that they pay more? not in our ratio nurseries, ratio, that they pay more? not in our ratio nurseries, it - ratio, that they pay more? not in our ratio nurseries, it does i our ratio nurseries, it does happen in others because the cost of staffing is so great. so happen in others because the cost of st
some are lamenting that this is the weaponry that didn t get to the ukrainians before. now now that it s in their, hands were kind of a difference can it make? well, it s making a great difference. we know, right now, that the two weapons that are having the most impact, that you re showing on video, the javelin anti tank missile. which is a brilliant, front lined system, has a thermal imager, you can see the heat and you can see and low light. all you have to do is lock on the tanker vehicle that you re attacking, press the button, once it launches you can get up and go get a cup of coffee. because the missile will do all of the work for you. it will fly, so you can get up and displays and move to another position, put on another missile. these things generally don t miss, the statistics we ve seen thus far, if they can be held up, our 89.5 hit ratio with these weapon systems. there are four main battle
you about the weapons used in this massacre? it s highly likely almost a certainty that it was a fully automatic weapon. i think there was one media outlet that broke it down into a time sequence and deducted that there were ten rounds per second. that s 600 hounds a minute. they fired for at least ten minutes. it sounds like that could be as many as 6,000 rounds fired. with 600 or so casualties. that s a pretty good hit ratio shall we say because of the crowd, obviously. so the shooter checked into this hotel, the mandalay bay hotel days ago and officials said they found 23 weapons in the hotel room, chris, including a handgun, multiple rifles, some had scopes on them. what does that tell you about his preparations? a good amount of preparation, especially for somebody that at least for all accounts has no military experience.