him. and the detectives and i keep coming back to this hit note, to where it is found. he doesn t know where quiroz it is. because remember, their inaction is very brief at that barbecue. detectives kept question quiroz. because they knew that whoever wanted garrett dead because here is one more twist, the postmark on the note is from after the shooting. meaning that it s not so much a hit note as a note explaining to someone how to go back and finish the job. is from after the shooting. it is a re-hit if you want to call it that. that finish the job note, says chun, started to unravel the mystery. that was kind of what s broke the case open. and that was quite frankly the lifeline we had on this case. the one unavoidable piece of evidence that finally cracked miguel quiroz. we go back round and round about this and finally he admits that he was one of the middlemen. miguel quiroz admitted that while he wasn t the shooter, he was in on the plot.
word, agüero. as anna gore hills the location of their homes, on the hit note found in quiroz the s car, and in claudia s letters, the word is misspelled the exact same way. claudia insist she had never given any notes or maps to miguel quiroz. did you ever give him anything like paperwork? no, not that i can think of, and no. so, if we had, say, someone s address within your handwriting? i don t know. not from me. i don t know. she claimed to know very little about what her brother manny might have been up to. why would your brother, who never even met garrett, want him killed? i don t know. why would you tell us that you are the one that asked him if he d kill and help arrange it? i don t know.
do you know who shot garrett warren? i don t know. do you know why he was shot? no, i don t know. but while there was evidence enough to charge claudia, was there enough to convict her? you ve got mr. quiroz admission. and you got mr. hernandez on tape. do you have anything proving that claudia haro set this in motion? we have the motive, the contentious divorce proceedings. we have the timing of this, because what happens is that the judge finds the child abuse allegations to be false. on april 12th of 2000, the hit occurs about a month and a week after that on may 20th of 2000. it s all of that circumstantial? i agree. but soon, there was more. prosecutors said the handwriting on the hit note matched claudia haro and when prosecutors compared samples of claudia s letters to garrett, with the hit notes, they noticed the misspelling of this
so we garrett was wrong in his assumption. so a left prosecutors with the question, who shot him? the cook heroes somehow be involved? prosecutor hoon we chun can to rethink the case. the defense attorneys agree that we can talk to mr. quiroz and they let us talk to him. and the detectives and i keep coming back to this hit note, to where it s found. he does not know who garrett warren was. their interaction was very brief at the barbecue. detectives kept questioning quiroz. because they knew that whoever wanted garrett dead is from after the shooting. meaning that it s not so much a hit to note as a note explaining to someone how to go back and finish the job. it is a re-hit if you want to call it that.
nighttime. a police informant wears a wire as he talks to a partner in crime. i don t go to worry about. you yeah you know, i m not like that. he miguel quiroz, he s the pizza parlor owner turned small time drug dealer. and the middleman with a hit note in his car targeting garrett warren. now, he was cooperating with investigators. detectives already knew quiroz wasn t the shooter. quiroz told them the man was the man who pulled the trigger was a old friend of him. his name was jorge hernandez. as a deal with prosecutors, quiroz wore a body wire and approached jorge hernandez at a party. he was one hernandez said that he