this direction, but this is very real and very possible in new york. well, willie, again, the question that i ve had since newtown is, who could be against universal checks? who in good faith could be against universal background checks? nine out of ten americans support that. republicans support it. the majority of nra members support it. the majority of every idealogical group supports universal background checks. why not do that? why not require gun safety, more rigorous gun safety at home, so 15-year-old kids can t get hold of guns, 17-year-old kids can t get ahold of ar-15s and go to kenosha. so our children understand that they can t do that. and the parents or others understand, if you don t lock your gun up and if somebody does, you re going to be responsible. there has to be a way, again, to enact gun safety laws that
i wonder what that moment was like. i didn t lock at the jury. i was trying to comfort. we did meet with the family and the attorneys and it was very emotional. we went to lunch and prepared ourselves for the worst because i have been in many courtrooms that it looked like it was going to be great and ended up different. i thank god that it ended up the way it did. we must keep fighting. it s a great day of celebration, but we have to keep fighting. you make an important point, which i wanted to ask you about any way. it clearly was critical for the jury as they had asked during deliberations to look at that again to it hear the 911 call. i m reminded of other cases, george floyd, where it was the video evidence that played such
those who kneel during the national anthem. colin kaepernick and other nfl players who have basically refused to stand for the national anthem. it is really dumb of them. what i rest them for doing it? know. but it is disrespectful. i have the same answer if you asked me about flagburning. i think it is a terrible thing to do but i wouldn t lock a person up. jillian: that never made air because the head of public affairs for the supreme court emailed her and ginsburg had misspoken, couric said she figured the late justice didn t fully understand the question and wanted to protect her on issues of racial justice were a blind spot for her. todd: she was sharp into her dying day on the court. that is very insulting.
is the attorney general is cautious and he wants to make sure it s done right and he s trying to right the ship of the department of justice that became so political. to do this, he wants to do it in the a political way and take his time. the congressional investigation is going forward. the ig investigation is going forward and after all, we are learning new things. eight months later, we re learning about this crazy guy, clark, who was under the impression that china was was spreading the information that china was changing the voting machines. but think of all the things we need to know still to get these witnesses. you say, well, we impeached him twice. we didn t convict him either time. one of the reasons why is because we didn t lock down the witnesses. what i m saying is and i think a lot of people are saying the justice department is, let s get these witnesses locked down. for example, why did we have this impeachment and mccarthy was never put in the grand jury on sworn unde
when they are attacked at this point and do you expect that s a line of questioning for the director he may get today? yes. i expect he will get all those sorts of questions. they re all good questions. look, companies are in a bad pog when they get hacked. it s not like the head of colonial pipeline or head of the jbs meat producing company had a really good choice or really bad choice and took the really bad choice. they had two awful choices. they re both bad choices. continue to try and yeah, exactly. they re both awful choices, hallie. so you try to pick the least bad choice to get your operations up and running as quickly as possible. the fbi is really, really good at what it does and we are we should all be grateful for their work, but they can t lock down every company. that has to be on private industry to do that, just as we have to lock our cars, and so members of the house judiciary committee can ask director wray about what the fbi can and should do, but we have