take the clicker. see this right here . y okay, i have no idea how to do it here . just making this up as we go along then you hit record and then ask you a question. all right. one time only or que every epis. all right. every episode of the angry man o go oh god. okay, yeah. . i hear your producers laughing in the background all laughing because it s easy. they re laughing at youy and e because we re hilarious.me all right. we love your show. we love you. we ll see you tomorrow. all right. i m laura ingraham. this is ingraham angle from washington tonight . writes for all that s the focus of tonight s angle now it wasn t until about 1992 when i began my clerkship for justice clarence thomas for thai really began to pay attention to how the media writes about the supreme court s. so i m talking about the new york times and the washingtonew post y time magazine, newsweek, et cetera. television reporters 90% of them believe that the court rulings were radical and outside the
background checks, getting government approval. the bad guys doing that .an peoplet just want to be able to defend themselves to the best of their ability. and that s what the supreme court said today. yeah, listen, everyone has t to understand that to get these concealed carry permits, nothing the court said today diminishes all ofmi the requirement set by various jurisdictions. all it says iss once you have all that you can t be denied arbitrarily the right to carry concealed. so none of these people have read the decision. kn none of the people knowbo anything about the law, but they re doing the histrionic thingrereth to try to scare peoe for political reasons. but leeann, you made it so clear forar thank you so much. it is great to see youou tonight . and while blue state governors respond to today s supreme court ruling has predictably comesp down on the side ofid the whole elites over the citizens things whileli many still think there could be viable options to lead