Latest Breaking News On - History of the supreme court - Page 7 : comparemela.com
Editorial sobre la condena del exmagistrado Francisco Javier Ricaurte - Editorial - Opinión
eltiempo.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from eltiempo.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
judge in texas is saying that the mandate is unconstitutional. so in his opinion, the entire law is invalid. we re joined now by cnn supreme court reporter arian devogue. states, are vowing to appeal this ruling. tell us how we got here. it was really a broad ruling. not only does he strike down the individual mandate, he says the whole thing has to go away. and keep in mind this is one district court judge and it will be appeal and he said the law will remain in effect for now pending the appeals. it was a broad ruling. i can help you a little bit to understand where it came from if you look at the history of the supreme court. it was only in 2012, that the supreme court upheld the individual mandate. and it was that controversial vote with chief justice john robert, remember the one that stunned conservatives and he said that it was okay under the taxing power, so then you fast
trump s supreme court nominee. in 2016 brett kavanaugh made this admission about a case he would like to see overturned. can you think of a case that deserves to be overturned? yes. would you volunteer one? no. pending confirmation hearings, yes, sir, right here. thank you very much. actually, i was going to say one. they said that s the independent counsel statute case. it has been efebtifectively overruled, but i would put the final nail in. considering everything we know about judge kavanaugh s expansive view of executive power and accountability, the fact of all the cases in all the history of the supreme court is the first case he could think of
independents, and don t have particular allegiance to one party or the other and that s why the reason why people aren t going out and voting because they don t see themselves represented. i think that that s frustrating and i can definitely agree with kat on that. there s no middle ground. you re left or right and nowhere in the middle. i think when we re talking about kavanaugh, honestly, people have to educate themselves on the process and on the history of the supreme court. neil: ladies, thank you very, very much. i know we switched gear, but i thought there were a lot of interesting comments in the ken starr interview that warranted this. in the meantime, a father in the shooting making sure there are no victims. i didn t think anything was going to work for me until i tried chantix. chantix, along with support, helps you quit smoking. chantix reduced my urge to smoke.
it s about government taking on the decision of a woman instead of giving the woman the power to make the decision herself. given the choice tween betwen corporations. if you care about guns and violence protection judge kavanaugh is you re worse nightmare. because he s so extreme on thish yew of presidential power. he s over reached more then any president in history the third one resonates too. i ll put them down as poses maybes.
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.