a flynn sentencing update tomorrow, but that was just canceled. what does that mean for the president s former national security advisor and for this case? they updated on us a few hours ago, they put that out. he s trying to delay his sentencing. the judge surprised everyone in this dramatic fashion and held this hearing, went after michael flynn, thought he should go to jail. the prosecutors had no position, they were saying 0 to 6 months. the judge was not satisfied with that and hinted strongly to michael flynn they should delay his sentencing because he s continue to cooperate. but interestingly enough in the filing today his status doesn t really change. what the government essentially has said is they re pretty much done with him. he s cooperating in this other case, but it s not a mueller investigation. of course they could always go back to him, but he also for all intents and purposes, he is done. the big thing here what s going on is they meant to delay it because they re
michael flynn that he should delay his sentencing because he s continuing to cooperate. but that s a former business partner of his and a case out of georgi va. but interestingly in the filing, his status doesn t really change. what the government has said is they re pretty much done with him. he s cooperating in this other case, but it s not a mueller investigation. of course they could always go back to him. he also, for all intents and purposes, he is done. the big thing here what s going on is they want to delay it because they re afraid that michael flynn his lawyers are afraid that the judge is going to put him in jail. so, matthew, we re all focused on mueller s criminal investigation, but former prosecutor nelson cunningham says that mueller is also continuing the counterintelligence investigation that started with suspicious trump/russia contracts in 2016. could this mean double trouble for the president? look, counterintelligence investigations are they tend to remain
people but they re not going to make changes but they don t know. so they re going to wait, not order changes, and just bet that it doesn t happen again. and that s a very foolish approach to safety. safety should be we know what s happened and we can make the change, not we re not going to make changes because we don t know. american airlines, mary, has more than 300 737s. only 24 are max 8s. southwest airlines has more than 350 737s. only 34 are max 8s. would it be easy to temporarily ground such a small amount of planes? well, i don t say it would be easy, but with fleets like that and the ability to change their fleets and make up for the shortages of the planes yes, for carriers like that they could do it. and they have experience in the past with other instances where they ve had to ground southwest had maintenance issues where they ve had to pull planes under orders. so why the resistance, then?
with our commitment free guarantee, there s never been a better time to start listening to audible. the most inspiring minds, the most compelling stories, the best place to listen. to start your free 30-day trial, text listen9 to 500500 today. this is charlie not coughing because he took delsym 12-hour. and this is charlie still not coughing while trying his hardest not to wake zeus. delsym 12-hour. nothing lasts longer for powerful cough relief. since you re heading off to dad. i just got a zerowater. but we ve always used brita. it s two stage-filter. doesn t compare to zerowater s 5-stage. this meter shows how much stuff,
caused ethiopia. so what they re saying is they don t know what caused it. two new planes have made holes in the ground and killed almost 350 people. but they re not going to make changes because they don t know. so they re going to wait, not order changes, and just bet that it doesn t happen again. and that s a very foolish approach to safety. safety should be, we know what s happened, and we can make the change, not, we re not going to make changes because we don t know. american airlines, mary, has more than 300 737s. southwest has more than 350 737s. only 34 are max 8s. would it be easy to temporarily ground such a small amount of planes. well, i won t say it would be easy, but with fleets like that and the ability to change their fleets and make up for the shortages of the planes, yes, for carriers like that, they could do it. and they have experience in the