brian: you actually wrote that. you have specific ideas of what to follow or knock it down to the basics. some of what you mentioned. we will talk about it later in the show, but also the way that the press was acting with the president a day ago, that fits in this box, as well. you believe we ve got to fundamentally bring civics back to school. secretary of education betsy devos can try to make that happen. why don t we feel it? we don t trust the masters of the universe at facebook or twitter to censor our speech but we as a nation have to get together and say you know what, we need formal education and civics, and that can be taught at the high school or college, a new example of what ethics are. ethics are not just cosmic ideologies. it s treating people the way you want to be treated. maybe we should just have a hippocratic idea of do no harm, if nothing else, to somebody when you engage with them in discourse. we ve had people in the media who have such terrible things on
the state attorney estimates more than a thousand videos were on the doctor s phone, clips of women in various states of consciousness and believes there may be many unidentified victims. how will authorities go about identifying the victims. definitely a case of twisted depravity and the doctor who defied his hippocratic oath which are the ethical standards that all surgeons and doctors are supposed to adhere to about drugging these women, i m telling you what authorities will be doing right now is they will painstakingly be going through the cell phones and apparently already i think they found hundreds if not close to a thousand videos and photos which support the charges that this doctor and his girlfriend were complicit. she wasn t an unwitting bystander. she was complicit in apparently drugging these women and then taking advantage of them for sexual purposes, so chilling,
duty to the president and said you should have done something very vastly different. a lot of lawyers looking at this think how could you have done what you did. harris: ethically. when did the ethics stop? for doctors they take the oath to protect and i think attorneys take a hippocratic type oath as well. for doctors it doesn t stop. like they keep treating you until they can t treat you anymore. michael cohen just turns evidence. how does that work? is it different? no, it s not. you take an oath. have you this ethical obligation to your client that so the things that you have discussions with your client, you take to the grave unless it s a commission of a crime or there is some issue regarding whether going to stop the commission of a crime. so there are certain exclusions to those ethical boundaries but ultimately, if you have this exchange with your client, it s supposed to be kept private. harris: thank you. mercedes, thanks for taking another kind of different look at al
he is compromised when the president has been ten times stronger against russia then mr. apologize for america and bribe the mullahs of iran with american dollars in cash. john brennan later walk that back. sean: the damage was done. because a lot of our allies who share intelligence with us heard him, same with our sources in russia who might worry about their safety because he s claiming the president could be blackmailed by vladimir putin. he needed to be taking the hippocratic oath of do no harm to our national security when he exercised his right to free speech. every time john brennan spins these insinuations, he is doing vladimir putin s dirty work. that s who he is today.
he is compromised when the president has been ten times stronger against russia then mr. apologize for america and bribe the mullahs of iran with american dollars in cash. john brennan later walk that back. sean: the damage was done. because a lot of our allies who share intelligence with us heard him, same with our sources in russia who might worry about their safety because he s claiming the president could be blackmailed by vladimir putin. he needed to be taking the hippocratic oath of do no harm to our national security when he exercised his right to free speech. every time john brennan spins these insinuations, he is doing